Sunday, 2 March 2025

Trump’s Dressing Down of Zelensky Plays Into Putin’s War Aims

Trump’s Dressing Down of Zelensky Plays Into Putin’s War Aims

Trump’s Dressing Down of Zelensky Plays Into Putin’s War Aims




President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia in Moscow this week, in a photograph released by Russian state media. One analyst said that given the spat between Washington and Kyiv, “Russia will be willing to keep fighting for longer, and more bitterly.” Credit...Mikhail Metzel/Sputnik, via Shutterstock






The public blowup could propel President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia to escalate the fight in Ukraine instead of agreeing to peace.







President Trump says he wants a quick cease-fire in Ukraine. But President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia appears to be in no rush, and the blowup on Friday between Mr. Trump and Ukraine’s president may give Russia’s leader the kind of ammunition he needs to prolong the fight.


With the American alliance with Ukraine suffering a dramatic, public rupture, Mr. Putin now seems even more likely to hold out for a deal on his terms — and he could even be tempted to expand his push on the battlefield.


The extraordinary scene in Washington — in which Mr. Trump lambasted President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine — was broadcast as the top story on state television in Russia on Saturday morning. It played into three years of Kremlin propaganda casting Mr. Zelensky as a foolhardy ruler who would sooner or later exhaust the patience of his Western backers.


For the Kremlin, perhaps the most important message came in later remarks by Mr. Trump, who suggested that if Ukraine did not agree to a “cease-fire now,” the war-torn country would have to “fight it out” without American help.


That could set up an outcome that Mr. Putin has long sought, at the cost of tens of thousands of Russian lives: a dominant position over Ukraine and wide-ranging concessions from the West.


In fact, Mr. Trump’s professed attempts to end the war quickly could intensify and prolong it, experts warned. If the United States is really ready to abandon Ukraine, Mr. Putin could try to seize more Ukrainian territory and end up with more leverage if and when peace talks ultimately take place.


"Russia will be willing to keep fighting for longer, and more bitterly," said Konstantin Remchukov, a Moscow newspaper editor with Kremlin ties, describing the consequences of Trump's public break with Zelenskyy. "If Zelenskyy says the Ukrainian people are ready to keep on fighting, Moscow will say, 'Sure, let's keep fighting.'"


If Friday's angry encounter in Washington leads to a further drop in U.S. military support for Ukraine, Remchukov said in a phone interview, the consequences could be profound, possibly even encouraging Putin to return to the broader territorial aims he pursued when he began his invasion in 2022.


"I wouldn't be surprised if Moscow decided to go further, to Odesa or Mykolaiv," Remchukov said, referring to key Black Sea ports that remain under Ukrainian control. "It could change the strategic direction of the offensive."


Despite the alignment that has emerged between Trump and Putin in recent weeks, many analysts have spotted a key difference in their views. While the American president says he wants to "stop the death" in Ukraine as soon as possible, the Russian leader says he wants to resolve the "root causes" of the war first.


For Putin, that terminology is code for his desire for a wider deal that would prevent Ukraine from joining NATO, limit the size of its military and grant Russia influence over its domestic politics -- along with a broader pullback of the NATO alliance across Eastern and Central Europe.


Such a deal, of course, would take months to negotiate, which is why Putin has appeared resistant to the idea of a quick ceasefire. The spat in the White House on Friday appeared to play into the Kremlin's hands because it may convince Trump that Zelenskyy, rather than Putin, is the more recalcitrant of the two leaders.


"You tell us, 'I don't want a ceasefire,'" Trump told Zelenskyy in the Oval Office. "I want a ceasefire because you'll get a ceasefire faster than an agreement."


Zelenskyy on Saturday reiterated his opposition to a quick ceasefire with Putin, saying that the Russian leader could not be trusted to uphold one. Instead, he said, Ukraine needed security guarantees from the West to deter future Russian attacks.


But Zelenskyy also signaled that he had not completely given up hope on repairing the relationship with Trump. And since the Friday meeting, he has publicly expressed thanks for America's support, after Vice President JD Vance accused him of not being grateful enough.


A Moscow foreign policy analyst who is close to the Kremlin said Saturday that any delay to peace talks was likely to benefit Russia because there was no deal in sight at present that would satisfy Putin. The analyst insisted on anonymity because of the sensitivities in Moscow of speaking to Western journalists.


Dmitry Suslov, an international relations specialist at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow, said in comments published by the Kommersant newspaper that Trump would become "even more favorable to Russia's position on a settlement" after "the fiasco of Zelenskyy's negotiations with Trump."


Suslov also raised the possibility of Russia's being able to grab far more than the roughly 20% of Ukrainian territory in the country's south and east that Moscow now holds.


If the United States stops providing weapons and intelligence to the Ukrainian military, Suslov wrote, "the pace of Kyiv's defeat on the battlefield will accelerate, with the prospect of a complete collapse of the front within months."


Friday's scene was a boon for Moscow in other ways, too. It may have helped advance, in just a matter of minutes, one of Putin's longtime goals: the removal of Zelenskyy from power in Ukraine.


Immediately after the White House meeting, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who has been one of his party's staunchest backers of Ukraine, said, "I don't know if we can ever do business with Zelenskyy again." He called the Ukrainian leader's behavior in the Oval Office "disrespectful."


The public dressing-down of Zelenskyy also accomplished another longtime goal of Putin's: cleaving the Western military alliance led by Washington that united behind Ukraine after Russia's 2022 invasion. European leaders immediately came out in support of Ukraine after the meeting, setting up a possible split with the United States, their longtime security backer.


Russian officials could hardly control their glee.


Dmitry A. Medvedev, the former Russian president who is deputy chair of the country's security council, cheered Trump on with a post on the social platform X, piling on to denounce Zelenskyy as an "insolent pig."


And Konstantin Kosachev, a senior Russian lawmaker, wrote on the Telegram social network, "Zelenskyy lost this round in a resounding crash," adding, "He will have to crawl on his knees to the next one."


Pro-Kremlin commentators who for years have been hurling invective against the United States could barely believe their change in fortune.


Igor Korotchenko, a military analyst who is a regular on Russian talk shows, wrote that he never thought he would be applauding the president of the United States.


"But tonight I applaud the 47th President of the United States Donald Trump -- Zelenskyy was thrown out of the White House like a garbage alley cat," Korotchenko wrote in a post on X.


Yet for all the schadenfreude in Russia, Friday's bitter meeting in Washington did little to illuminate a pathway toward a settlement. And while Putin may want to extend the war, he could also suffer if it goes on much longer, given the country's economic problems and steep battlefield casualties.


"The Russian leadership would like to end the war on its own terms, not just restore ties with the U.S.," Grigorii Golosov, a professor of political science at the European University in St. Petersburg, said in a phone interview. "The prospects for that are not clearer at all despite what happened yesterday."































Saturday, 1 March 2025

Zelensky’s presidency is over – Scott Ritter

Zelensky’s presidency is over – Scott Ritter

Zelensky’s presidency is over – Scott Ritter




Former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter. ©Global Look Press/Pavel Kashaev






Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky’s presidency is over, former US Marine Corps intelligence officer Scott Ritter has told RT. Zelensky’s five-year term in office concluded in May 2024, but he has refused to hold new elections, citing martial law. According to Ritter, Washington is “fed up” with Zelensky, who US President Donald Trump recently labeled a “dictator without elections,” and is moving to unseat him.







Ritter’s words come on the heels of a meeting in the White House between Zelensky, Trump, and US Vice President J.D. Vance on Friday, in which a heated exchange took place after Trump told the Ukrainian leader that he would have to negotiate peace with Russia. Zelensky argued that Moscow cannot be trusted and insisted that the US continue supporting Kiev. Trump said Zelensky is “in no position to dictate” to the US, accusing him of being ungrateful for America’s substantial aid and questioning his willingness to bring about an end to the conflict with Russia.


According to Ritter, the meeting was a “setup” to discredit Zelensky and “confront him with the inconsistencies of his position.”


“Zelensky is not a democratically elected president… This was a deliberate setup by the president of the US. The Trump administration is fed up with Zelensky,” he said, arguing that he brought it upon himself by openly antagonizing Trump.


This is the end of Zelensky’s presidency. He will not recover from this. Ukraine cannot afford to have him as their leader, and I think you’re going to see Zelensky being exited stage right as rapidly as possible.


According to Ritter, the relationship between Trump and Zelensky is now “fundamentally broken.” However, unlike Ukraine, he said, Russia has never “lost the discipline” in contacts with the US and disrupted peace efforts, despite “some fundamental disagreements” on how to resolve the conflict.


“Zelensky was the greatest impediment to the US and Russia to achieve a peace deal... He had to be removed, and now he has been removed,” Ritter explained. He went on to say that while Zelensky’s removal may be “the beginning of the political collapse of Ukraine,” it might not necessarily be a bad thing in terms of peace because “the war is all but over at this point.”


Zelensky has so far dismissed calls to step down. In an interview with Fox News following the meeting with Trump and responding to a call from US Senator Lindsey Graham “to resign and send somebody over that we can do business with,” Zelensky said he won’t do so unless asked by the Ukrainian people.







Zelensky should apologize for ‘fiasco’ with Trump – Rubio



US President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance meet with Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky in the Oval Office, Washington, DC, February 28, 2025.
©Getty Images/Andrew Harnik



Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky “should apologize” for turning his meeting with US President Donald Trump into a “fiasco,” US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said. In an interview with CNN on Friday, Rubio slammed Zelensky for “wasting” everyone’s time with his attitude and questioned his true intentions regarding the conflict with Russia.


Zelensky, Trump, and Vice President J.D. Vance met earlier on Friday in the White House Oval Office for what was expected to be the formal signing of a minerals agreement between Washington and Kiev. However, the meeting descended into a verbal spat after Trump told Zelensky that he would have to negotiate peace with Russia. Zelensky argued that Russian President Vladimir Putin cannot be trusted and insisted that the US should continue supporting his country, prompting Trump to accuse him of ungratefulness and an unwillingness to negotiate an end to the conflict.


“[Zelensky] should apologize for wasting our time for a meeting that was going to end the way it did… for turning this thing into the fiasco for him that it became,” Rubio said, commenting on the meeting.


“There was no need for him to go in there and become antagonistic,” he added, criticizing the Ukrainian leader for the talks “going off the rails.” Rubio also accused Zelensky of sticking to his animosity towards Putin instead of focusing on the only viable path towards peace, which he said was getting Russia to the negotiation table.


“Attacking Putin, calling him names… and maximalist demands about Russia having to pay for the reconstruction – when you start talking about that aggressively, you’re not going to get people to the table,” he stated, noting that Zelensky’s attitude could be viewed as “active open undermining” of efforts to bring about the end of the conflict.


Following the meeting, Fox News journalist Jacqui Heinrich wrote on X that the Ukrainian delegation was “begging” for a reset, but was asked to leave the White House grounds and only return when Zelensky was “ready for peace.”


In an interview on Fox News shortly after the meeting, Zelensky admitted it did not go well, but signaled he did not plan to apologize to the US leader. He claimed he thought “we have to be very open and very honest” in bilateral interaction, blamed some of the statements he made on being lost in translation, but ultimately said he was “unsure” that he did something “bad” to offend Trump.

















Starmer insists on deploying British troops to Ukraine

Starmer insists on deploying British troops to Ukraine

Starmer insists on deploying British troops to Ukraine




London and Brussels must play “a full part” in providing security guarantees for Kiev, the UK prime minister has said Starmer insists on deploying British troops to Ukraine


UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer pictured during a joint press conference with US President Donald Trump at the White House on February 27, 2025 in Washington, DC.
©Alex Wong/Getty Images






The UK and EU must be involved in a peace settlement in Ukraine, which includes putting boots on the ground, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has said following talks with US President Donald Trump in Washington. The US has recently initiated peace talks with Russia, sidelining both the EU and UK.







Starmer met with Trump at the White House on Thursday, where they discussed a plan to reach an enduring peace in Ukraine.


”The European countries, including the United Kingdom, need to play a full part in that,” Starmer said in an interview on Fox News.


London will play “a leading part,” he insisted, whether it’s “troops on the ground… or possible air, maritime work” together with the EU. The UK and France have previously said they are prepared to deploy peacekeeping troops to Ukraine to secure any peace deal with Russia.


Trump has indicated, however, that Washington has no plans to send US forces to support a European-led peacekeeping mission, arguing that Russian President Vladimir Putin can be trusted to not breach the eventual agreement.


Moscow has opposed the deployment of unauthorized troops to Ukraine, warning that without a UN mandate, they would be considered legitimate targets.


Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said the idea of deploying foreign troops to Ukraine is being pushed primarily by France and Britain, suggesting that this is meant to “further fuel the conflict and stop any attempts to cool it down.” The Foreign Ministry also accused the EU and UK of embarking “on a path of militarism.”


Britain has been a steadfast supporter of Ukraine since the conflict escalated three years ago, providing substantial military aid and implementing stringent sanctions against Russia. As of February, London has committed nearly $10 billion in military assistance to Kiev.

Friday, 28 February 2025

BRICS must end dollar’s dominance – Lula

BRICS must end dollar’s dominance – Lula

BRICS must end dollar’s dominance – Lula




Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. ©Getty Images/Anadolu via Getty Images






Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has said that the BRICS nations will not stop their de-dollarization efforts despite US President Donald Trump’s tariff threats and will continue to seek options to move trade from the greenback.







Trump has issued numerous threats to BRICS since being elected last November. He has acknowledged that the bloc’s push to minimize dependence on the dollar in bilateral trade and promote national currencies undermines the dominance of the greenback, a tendency he seeks to resist.


Speaking at a meeting of the group’s sherpas on Thursday, Lula said that Brazil’s BRICS chairmanship this year will strengthen the bloc’s push for a multipolar world. The group – which recently expanded and now comprises Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Ethiopia, Iran, and Egypt – has been boosting the use of national currencies in mutual trade.


US President Donald Trump’s threats of tariffs won’t stop the group’s determination to seek alternative platforms for payments between member countries,” Lula said.


Trump has repeatedly threatened to cut trade with members of the group if they try “to destroy” the dollar.


Earlier this month, he once again pledged to impose massive tariffs on all imports from BRICS countries if they proceed with plans to establish a common currency. The current BRICS members account for about 46% of the world’s population and over 36% of global GDP, according to various estimates.


Trump warned last week that “any BRICS state that even mentions the destruction of the dollar will be charged a 150% tariff.”


Speculation about a potential BRICS single currency has circulated in recent years. In 2023, Lula voiced support for the idea of a trading currency within the economic grouping, drawing parallels to the euro.


Although BRICS members have denied plans to establish a single currency, they have ramped up efforts to reduce reliance on Western currencies in bilateral trade in recent years.


The trend gained significant momentum after Russia was cut off from the Western financial system and had its foreign reserves frozen in 2022, as part of Ukraine-related sanctions.


BRICS states, including Russia, have claimed the US is weakening the dollar itself by politicizing it with sanctions.





















Thursday, 27 February 2025

WATCH humanoid robot perform kung fu

WATCH humanoid robot perform kung fu

WATCH humanoid robot perform kung fu




©YouTube/Unitree Robotics






Chinese robotics company Unitree has shared a video featuring its humanoid robot doing kung fu moves. The bot’s balance capabilities and range of movement have been upgraded, the firm said.







Humanoid robots are made to resemble and act like humans, imitating facial expressions, movements, and speech.

The video teaser published by the Hangzhou-based company earlier this week shows the human-like robot walking down the street while performing various martial arts strikes and kicking techniques. Unitree stated that the latest algorithm upgrade allows its G1 humanoid robot to “learn and perform virtually any movement.”





As per the company’s website, the $16,000 G1 humanoid robot, which debuted in August 2023, features powered joints on its arms, legs, and torso that allow 23 degrees of freedom.


Earlier this month, Unitree unveiled video footage of its humanoid G1 and H1 androids showing off new moves. G1, a more affordable version of the robot, was shown running, navigating uneven terrain, and walking in a more natural way. The taller H1 model performed a preset routine alongside human dancers at the Spring Festival Gala event marking the Chinese New Year.


A number of companies – including Japan’s Honda, Hyundai Motor’s Boston Dynamics, and Agility Robotics – have been betting on humanoid robots to meet potential labor shortages in certain industries by performing repetitive tasks that may be seen as dangerous or tedious. Tesla, Meta, and OpenAI have recently joined the trend.


Earlier this month, Bloomberg cited sources as stating that Meta Platforms is planning to invest into futuristic robots that can act like humans and assist with physical tasks. The company is reportedly forming a new team within its Reality Labs hardware division to conduct the work.


Last December, media reports emerged that OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, is seeking to develop its own android. Last year, electric-vehicle producer Tesla announced plans to introduce humanoid robots for internal purposes starting in 2025, with plans for broader production by the following year.


Valued at $1.8 billion in 2023, the global humanoid robot market is projected to soar to more than $13 billion over the next five years, according to research firm MarketsandMarkets.
















Wednesday, 26 February 2025

DOGE’s grab of personal data stokes privacy and security fears

DOGE’s grab of personal data stokes privacy and security fears

DOGE’s grab of personal data stokes privacy and security fears




Elon Musk speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Oxon Hill, Maryland, on Thursday. (Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images)






Deputies of Elon Musk have sought access to massive amounts of information across the federal government, much of it personal and highly revelatory in its insights into the lives of everyday Americans.







They justify their work for the U.S. DOGE Service as a dogged quest for government efficiency. But people with deep knowledge of federal data systems and cybersecurity say they’re skirting guardrails meant to protect sensitive data from misuse.


Before DOGE launched, most of the records at issue were kept in the hands of a select few officials to preserve privacy and avoid crossing legal red lines. Now Musk’s group is seeking often unfettered access, citing suspicion of fraud and waste. In addition to concerns about exposing private information, some critics fear handing all the data to DOGE could enable bad actors to leak sensitive information to compromise political adversaries, act on personal vendettas or stir up online mobs against opponents.


This article is based on interviews with more than a dozen current or former government employees and officials with knowledge of government databases and systems, many of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retribution.


Representatives for the White House did not return multiple requests for comment.


Musk presides over DOGE from a command center in a room of the old Secretary of War’s suite in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, where rainbow-colored lights emanate from the tower and keyboard of the powerful gaming computer he uses to conduct government business. A “Make America Great Again” hat and a placard reading “D.O.G.E.” sit on a large wooden desk, and cords snake across the carpet into a surge protector.


Within the White House complex, the WiFi permissions — meant to bolster security by prompting users to log in frequently — were recently changed to allow guests to remain logged in for a year, up from seven days, because so many personal devices are newly in use.


Already, DOGE associates have been granted access to sensitive material, having targeted federal payment portals and other massive datasets on government expenditures. That included Treasury payment systems, which green-light federal dollars headed out of government accounts, and highly guarded systems at the IRS and Social Security Administration, which include detailed financial and medical information.


Last week, the lead engineer for a government text-messaging service resigned over a DOGE ally’s request for access to data including personal identifying information about many Americans. On Tuesday, 21 staffers of the U.S. DOGE Service, the entity formed as the U.S. Digital Service under President Barack Obama and renamed in Trump’s Day 1 executive order establishing DOGE, announced their resignations in protest. The group — consisting of engineers, designers, product managers and IT and operations staff — said they had been subjected to questions about “political loyalty” as part of a DOGE interview process that introduced “significant security risks.” DOGE’s actions, they wrote, have included “mishandling sensitive data” and “breaking critical systems” in ways that are incompatible with the original USDS mission."


“We will not use our skills as technologists to compromise core government systems, jeopardize Americans’ sensitive data, or dismantle critical public services,” the departing staffers said in the letter, written on official letterhead and addressed to White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. "We will not lend our expertise to carry out or legitimize DOGE’s actions.”


Among its initial actions, DOGE has posted classified information on its website, sharing the budget and staffing level of the National Reconnaissance Office spy agency.


Just allowing Musk and his team to see some records isn’t illegal. Because they’re designated as “special government employees” and many are senior advisers at Cabinet agencies, they are entitled to much of the access they have sought, and some judges have declined to kick them out while hearing more evidence.


But they need a reasonable basis to peruse files and databases, experts said, and a procedure for ensuring precautions are followed. And the people with access must be vetted and trained, said Brad Moss, an attorney representing plaintiffs in one of more than a dozen lawsuits contesting DOGE’s handling of data.


Limiting entry to sensitive systems guards against any one federal worker gaining too much access, protecting both the data and the overall system, said Terry Lutes, who served as IRS associate chief information officer from 2003 to 2006. Lutes said even the most experienced employees are given only segments of access to the IRS’s Integrated Data Retrieval System, or IDRS.


DOGE sought access to that system last week, which would have provided the ability to see, and in some cases edit, detailed records — including bank accounts, payment balances, Social Security and other personal identification numbers and, in some instances, medical information — for virtually every individual, business and nonprofit in the country.


Musk’s DOGE seeks access to personal taxpayer data, raising alarm at IRS

The Internal Revenue Service building in Washington, D.C. (Annabelle Gordon/Reuters)




“If anybody actually understood how all these pieces work together, we’d have to shoot them. They’d be too dangerous,” Lutes said. “And I’m only halfway joking.”


Access to the IDRS, in particular, would pose a massive risk, Lutes said. Entry to the system is so protected “I would have fired anyone who tried to give me access.”


An agreement between the White House and the Treasury Department limited DOGE to anonymized data, the same visibility that some academic researchers get.


Concerns about how Musk’s team could use data stretch beyond the IRS and into other agencies that collect information that workers fear could be exploited.


One employee of the U.S. Digital Service, the Obama-era White House office that President Donald Trump re-designated the U.S. DOGE Service on his first day in office, started seeing his work differently once Musk took the reins.


The person, who was involved in a government program that includes a database of addresses, has been grappling with the implications of work he felt proud of — which he suddenly fears could be used to go after people for purposes such as immigration enforcement.


“Now I feel like a little bit of an enabler,” said the person, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive information. “I feel like I’ve been a part of creating a trap for people.”


Clashes over DOGE’s requests for access have also prompted resignations. At the Treasury Department, the highest-ranking career official left in late January after a dispute over access to payment systems. Earlier this month, the Social Security Administration’s acting commissioner departed after a disagreement over DOGE’s attempts to access sensitive data.


At the IRS, taxpayers whose information is wrongfully disclosed or even inspected are entitled by law to monetary damages. Social Security employees who violate privacy laws could face stiff fines and jail time.


DOGE could use protected personal information at Social Security — including the world’s largest repository of medical information — to search for improper payments, but it wouldn’t amount to much return on investment, according to former senior agency officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal conversations.


For years, officials there have studied the threshold at which detecting improper payments becomes unprofitable. The agency has repeatedly explored building more robust systems to ferret out over- and underpayments, which accounted for 0.3 percent of the more than $1.3 trillion in payments in the 2024 fiscal year, adding up to roughly $4 billion, according to federal data. But it could cost more than that to track all the money down, the former officials said.


The prospect of highly protected information being misused is alarming some people outside government.


Kristofer Goldsmith, an Iraq War veteran who tracks and reports violent right-wing extremists, said he has grown worried for his safety since learning that some of the DOGE members had frequented internet groups popular with criminal hackers or espoused extremist views.


After letting his guard down, he said, he has gone back to wearing a gun in his own home.


“I’m very concerned that the entire federal government is being compromised by people who want to target, harass and maybe even kill me,” Goldsmith said. He is a plaintiff in a lawsuit over DOGE’s access to personal records that led to a temporary restraining order Monday against the government.


Researchers have raised red flags about some of DOGE’s team. They include Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old former Musk company intern who posted in channels associated with the Com, a loose network including many young criminals. An online handle he used once solicited an illegal denial-of-service attack. Coristine now has an email address at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, which is in charge of defending federal agencies and essential private industries from cyberattacks. Coristine didn’t respond to emailed requests for comment.


Another DOGE worker, Gavin Kliger, who sought access to records at the IRS, has retweeted white nationalist Nick Fuentes and written of being inspired by media criticism from a Holocaust denier. “I am Jewish and any insinuation of support for ‘white nationalism’ or ‘anti-semitism’ is false and defamatory,” Kliger told The Washington Post.


Musk has a track record of violating privacy norms. When he took over X, then known as Twitter, his deputies publicly posted some private communications of former employees, alleging that they were proof of a liberal censorship conspiracy inside Twitter.


A group of FBI agents who investigated the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol has also sued, arguing that government records showing what they did in those cases could be used for harassment.


Moss, their attorney, is trying to stop further dissemination of their names, arguing that any list being compiled would be not to probe wrongdoing but “to dox and expose the identities of federal officials, which would ordinarily be respected.”


Moss and others say sweeping Washington agencies for data runs afoul of the Privacy Act, the Watergate-era reform law that limits what officials can do with information on Americans, not just federal workers.


Searching for fraud, waste and abuse, as well as trying to develop more efficient government systems, could be valid reasons for DOGE to access the data, several lawyers opposing DOGE say. Feeding data into artificial intelligence programs, which The Post and others have reported the Education Department is doing, and is suspected by employees elsewhere, may also be legal if the move involves closely guarded, in-house programs.


But such actions increase the chances of inappropriate access, intentional or not, said Alan Butler, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a nonprofit based in D.C. that advocates for privacy protections.


“It’s pretty clear they want to use matching type systems to find payments they claim are fraudulent, and matching against datasets or key terms would be anathema to the Privacy Act if done on a whim or without limits,” said Butler, whose group is suing DOGE and the Office of Personnel Management claiming privacy and data security violations on behalf of itself and an unnamed federal employee.