Thursday, 23 March 2023

The Fed, Still Inflation-Focused, Raised Rates Amid Bank Uncertainty

The Fed, Still Inflation-Focused, Raised Rates Amid Bank Uncertainty

The Fed, Still Inflation-Focused, Raised Rates Amid Bank Uncertainty










Jeanna Smialek






Federal Reserve officials raised interest rates by a quarter-point on Wednesday as they tried to balance two conflicting problems: the risk that inflation could remain rapid and the threat that turmoil in the banking system could slow the economy drastically.







The Fed on Wednesday pushed interest rates to a range of 4.75 percent to 5 percent, and officials forecast one more rate increase in 2023 — though they hinted even that was uncertain. In doing so, policymakers tried to signal that they remained focused on wrestling down price increases but were also paying attention to financial threats.


“In assessing the need for further hikes, we’ll be focused on incoming data and the evolving outlook, and in particular on our assessment of the actual and expected effects of credit tightening,” Jerome H. Powell, the Fed chair, suggested at his post-meeting news conference.


The Fed’s statement said that some additional rate moves “may be” warranted, and Mr. Powell emphasized that “may” was crucial: Officials do not know that yet.


His comments underlined that the outlook for whether rates would rise further — and, if so, by how much — had been made uncertain by turmoil in the banking industry that could make loans harder to come by, slowing the economy.


Officials forecast that next year they would lower rates more slowly than they had anticipated, so that rates linger at 4.3 percent by the end of 2024, up from 4.1 percent. That suggested that the fight for stable inflation could be a longer and more gradual one than many had expected even a few months ago, though the outlook is complicated by the bank turmoil.


The forecasts and Mr. Powell’s remarks together underlined that his central bank is confronting a complicated moment — and trying to buy itself the time to decide how to react.


The Fed has raised interest rates at the fastest pace since the 1980s over the past year to try to cool a hot economy. Yet inflation has been surprisingly stubborn, and the job market remains strong. Those facts would likely have called for a more aggressive Fed response.







But high-profile bank collapses in recent weeks have underscored the risk that rapid Fed rate moves could stoke financial instability. Silicon Valley Bank, which failed on March 10, did so partly because it had amassed big losses on its portfolio of securities as interest rates climbed. And even more critically, the bank problems threaten to weigh on lending and spending, which ramps up the risk of a recession.


“The bottom line is: Credit conditions are going to tighten, and the Fed is acknowledging that,” said Diane Swonk, the chief economist at KPMG. The Fed “would like a slow cooling,” she added. “They just don’t want a deep freeze. And this increases the chances that the economy falls through the ice.”


Stocks, which initially jumped after the Fed’s decision was announced, fell sharply on Wednesday, finishing the day down 1.65 percent as investors digested the Fed’s interest rate move and comments by Janet Yellen, the Treasury secretary, suggesting that the government was not looking into a plan to extend broad protection for uninsured deposits.


The continuing jitters about the banking system come at a time when the economy has otherwise appeared strong — in spite of the Fed’s policy adjustments.


The Fed has been rapidly raising its policy interest rate since March 2022, making it more expensive to borrow money in hopes of cooling spending and eventually weighing down inflation. Officials made four straight three-quarter-point rate increases last year before slowing to a half-point in December and a quarter-point in early February.


Just two weeks ago, many economists and investors thought central bankers might speed their rate moves back up at this meeting because incoming economic data had retained so much momentum. Policymakers had hinted that they might revise up their forecasts for how much interest rates would rise in 2023.


“As of a couple of weeks ago, it looked like we’d need to raise rates — over the course of the year — more than we’d expected,” Mr. Powell acknowledged on Wednesday.


But the Fed chair explained that the bank problems had changed the outlook. By making it harder for consumers to access credit to buy houses or cars, or make other big purchases, the issues could weigh on demand, allowing the Fed to adjust interest rates less drastically.








“Recent developments are likely to result in tighter credit conditions for households and businesses and to weigh on economic activity, hiring and inflation,” the Fed’s policy committee said in its post-meeting statement. “The extent of these effects is uncertain.”


Economists at Goldman Sachs estimate that the effect could be equivalent to the slowdown prompted by one or two Fed rate increases. Mr. Powell seemed to suggest during his news conference that his estimate — while far from clear — was in that ballpark.


“You can think of it as being the equivalent of a rate hike, or perhaps more than that,” he said. “Of course, it’s not possible to make that assessment today with any precision whatsoever.”



Note :



The rate is the upper limit of the federal funds target range. Projections for future rates go back to March 2018.
Source: Federal Reserve
By Lazaro Gamio


But even with a bank-induced hit to the economy, the process of restoring stable inflation could take time.


Policymakers expected rapid price increases to be a more lasting problem, based on their fresh economic estimates. Officials thought inflation would finish 2023 at 3.3 percent, up from 3.1 percent in their December projections. That inflation measure was 5.4 percent in January.


Central bankers aim for 2 percent inflation on average over time. While price increases have been slowing from very elevated levels last year — the Fed’s preferred inflation index peaked at about 7 percent last summer — that progress has not been as steady as many hoped.


Continued price increases are weighing on family budgets, and there is a risk that a long period of quick inflation could make price increases a more permanent feature of the American economy.


That is what central bankers are trying to avoid. By lifting rates quickly over the past year, they have hoped to cool growth and bring inflation under control promptly. While brisk monetary policy adjustments increase the risk of financial turmoil and other problems, central bankers have worried that inflation will be harder and more painful to stamp out if it becomes entrenched in daily household and business behavior.


Once people are used to asking for big pay raises to cover climbing costs, and companies are used to making regular price increases, it could take a bigger economic downturn to rewire those habits and change the course of price increases.


“We have to bring inflation down to 2 percent,” Mr. Powell said. “The costs of failing are much higher.”


Jerome H. Powell said that the Federal Reserve raised interest rates to combat inflation amid turmoil in the banking system. Credit...T.J. Kirkpatrick for The New York Times




A critical question is whether the Fed will be able to slow the economy enough to cool inflation without a recession. Mr. Powell suggested that he still thought such a “soft landing” was possible — though he acknowledged that the recent banking upheaval has not helped.

“I think that pathway still exists,” Mr. Powell said. “We’re certainly trying to find it.”

Wall Street analysts have pointed out that the risks are greater in a world with financial turmoil, given that problems in the banking sector can easily spill over to hit Main Street.

“You have the trigger that can make it into a deeper recession — can make it into a hard landing,” said Priya Misra, the head of global rates strategy at TD Securities.




























Tens of thousands without power in California as latest storm lashes state

Tens of thousands without power in California as latest storm lashes state

Tens of thousands without power in California as latest storm lashes state




Floodwaters from the Tule River inundate the area after days of heavy rain in Corcoran, California, U.S., March 21, 2023. REUTERS/David Swanson






Tens of thousands of storm-weary Californians were without power and under evacuation warnings on Wednesday as the latest storm packing wind-blown rain and snow threatened to bring more flooding to the rain-soaked state.







The "atmospheric river" storm could dump more than an additional 1 inch (3 cm) of rain throughout the day in parts of the already-saturated Southern and Central California region, which has been hit hard by a relentless string of storms that began in late December.


High-wind warnings and advisories were in effect from the Mexico border through Los Angeles and up into the San Francisco Bay area, where gusts of up to 60 miles per hour (97 kph) were forecast for some spots.


Much of the region along with parts of Arizona and Nevada were under flood watches and advisories on Wednesday caused by the continued rain and snow melt, the National Weather Service said.


"Our rivers, streams and creeks are flowing at near capacity. Any more rain that we get today is only going to cause more flooding or worsen the flooding that is ongoing," said Bill South, a National Weather Service meteorologist in Hanford, California.


More than 14,000 people statewide were under orders to seek higher ground because of flooding, with evacuation warnings issued for another 47,000 residents, Diana Crofts-Pelayo, a spokesperson for the California Office of Emergency Services, said on Tuesday.


The bulk of evacuation orders, covering some 12,000 people, were in Tulare County, a flood-stricken region in the San Joaquin Valley, where high water from recent levee breaches has inundated a number of communities, Crofts-Pelayo said.


More than 100,000 homes and businesses in Central California were without power early on Wednesday after strong winds from the storm took down power lines and trees, according to utility tracking service PowerOutage.us.







"The system exceeded all expectations," the utility company Pacific Gas and Electric (PCG_pa.A) said in a statement on its website, noting that winds of 89 mph were clocked in Santa Clara County.


The storm was also bringing heavy snow to higher elevations. Total snow accumulations of up to 4 feet (1.22 m) and locally up to 5 feet, were in the forecast, the weather service said.







PARADE OF STORMS



The storm marked the 12th so-called atmospheric river since December to sweep the U.S. West Coast, formed from an immense airborne current of dense water vapor carried aloft from the ocean and flowing overland in bouts of heavy rain and snow.


The rapid succession of Pacific storms during the past three months has created an abrupt reversal of fortune for a state preoccupied for the past few years by drought and wildfires - a swing in weather extremes that experts say is symptomatic of human-induced climate change.


California's harsh winter has caused widespread property damage and upheaval for thousands of residents, with more than 20 deaths attributed to the storms.


But the glut of precipitation has also replenished sorely depleted reservoirs and the state's mountain snowpack.



























Mission complete: Russian senator on parliamentary commission's probe into biolaboratories

Mission complete: Russian senator on parliamentary commission's probe into biolaboratories

Mission complete: Russian senator on parliamentary commission's probe into biolaboratories




Russian Federation Council Deputy Speaker Konstantin Kosachev
©Russian Foreign Ministry/TASS






Russia’s parliamentary commission investigating the work of American biological laboratories in Ukraine considers its mission completed as it managed to piece together the puzzle of the US’ biological activities across the world, co-head of the commission, Deputy Speaker of Russia's Federation Council (upper house) Konstantin Kosachev said on Wednesday.







"What we saw was obviously not originally meant to be discovered, much less be investigated. But we, our parliamentary commission, considers its mission completed. We managed to piece together a fragmented picture of the current developments. We have no doubt left that the US’ medical-biological program is of dual purpose, and this second purpose of the US’ program is its military dimension," he said.


At the very least, the issue is about Washington’s having the technology to produce biological weapons, and at most to produce these biological weapons for use in any corner of the planet if necessary, Kosachev added. "And as the Americans have declared Russia as the main geopolitical opponent and even enemy, the Russian territory obviously stands at the top of this list," he noted.



Biolabs Commission Concluded That US Ready to Produce Weapons Outside It, Moscow Says



The Commission on the biological program in Ukraine has come to the conclusion that the United States is ready to produce and use biological weapons outside its territory, Deputy Speaker of the Federation Council (upper chamber of the Russian parliament) Konstantin Kosachev said on Wednesday.


"Based on all that has been said, our commission comes to the conclusion... the United States supports and develops the ability to create components of biological weapons, and, if necessary, to produce and use them outside the national territory," Kosachev said during a meeting of the commission.


"AS melanggar hampir semua ketentuan Konvensi Senjata Biologis (BWC)", kata Kosachev.


"The Commission comes to the conclusion that by their actions in the field of global biological security, the United States violates almost all the fundamental provisions of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction," Kosachev said.


























N.Y. grand jury weighing possible Trump indictment not expected to meet today

N.Y. grand jury weighing possible Trump indictment not expected to meet today

N.Y. grand jury weighing possible Trump indictment not expected to meet today




Former president Donald Trump speaks during an event in Davenport, Iowa, on March 13. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)






Today, a grand jury in New York hearing evidence in a case involving alleged hush-money payments to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels is not expected to meet, leaving open the question of whether former president Donald Trump will be indicted. Trump, who had previously predicted incorrectly he would be arrested Tuesday, shared on social media a news report suggesting that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg could take a pass on prosecuting him — while he continued to attack Bragg.







In Washington, it’s a busy hearing day on Capitol Hill. Among those testifying: Norfolk Southern chief executive Alan Shaw and several senior Biden administration officials, including Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen.


Criminal charges against Mr. Trump have been hotly anticipated since at least Saturday, when the former president, with no direct knowledge, declared on his social media platform that he would be arrested on Tuesday. But the grand jury, which meets in the afternoons, heard from a witness on Monday until nearly 5 p.m., leaving little time for anything else.


The grand jury meets on Mondays, Wednesdays and Thursdays and may hear from at least one more witness before being asked to vote, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Because the proceeding is held in secret, it is unclear whether other witnesses could appear as well.


There was no indication as to why the grand jury was not meeting on Wednesday, but the panel is not required to convene all three days each week, and scheduling conflicts and other interruptions are not unusual.


A spokeswoman for the Manhattan district attorney’s office declined to comment.


The news of the canceled session was first reported by Insider.


While an indictment of Mr. Trump is not a certainty, prosecutors working for the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin L. Bragg, have signaled that charges are likely. They have been scrutinizing Mr. Trump for the hush-money payment that was made by his former fixer, Michael D. Cohen, in the run-up to the 2016 election.







The timing of any potential indictment is unknown, and an arrest and arraignment — the criminal proceeding in which a defendant is formally charged — would not immediately follow. In order to indict Mr. Trump, Mr. Bragg’s prosecutors must ask the grand jury to vote whether to charge him. A majority of the 23 jurors must agree to do so.


Once witness testimony has concluded, prosecutors are expected to explain any charges they are seeking to the jurors before asking them to vote. With the grand jury not meeting on Wednesday, the earliest that is likely to happen is Thursday afternoon.


The charges likely center on the way Mr. Trump and his company, the Trump Organization, handled reimbursing Mr. Cohen for the payment of $130,000 to the porn star Stormy Daniels. The company’s internal records falsely identified the reimbursements as legal expenses, which helped conceal the purpose of the payments, according to Mr. Cohen, who said Mr. Trump knew about the misleading records. (Mr. Trump’s lawyers deny that and have accused Mr. Bragg’s office of targeting the former president for political purposes.)


In New York, falsifying business records can be a crime, and Mr. Bragg’s office is likely to build the case around that charge, according to people with knowledge of the matter.



Trump 'hush money' grand jury called off for Wednesday, delaying possible indictment vote



The Manhattan 'hush-money' grand jury has been told not to come in on Wednesday, a cancellation that comes on the brink of a possible historic indictment vote of former President Donald Trump, according to two law enforcement officers.


And while nothing beyond Wednesday is set in stone, it is unlikely that the grand jury will meet at all this week, said one of the law enforcement sources, who spoke to Insider on condition of anonymity.


The grand jury has been meeting on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays to hear evidence of Trump's alleged role in approving a 2016 election-eve payment of $130,000 to adult film actress Stormy Daniels, money that federal prosecutors have called an illegal campaign expenditure.








Star prosecution witness Michael Cohen had told reporters as recently as last week that he had expected to be the grand jury's final witness.


Star prosecution witness Michael Cohen had told reporters as recently as last week that he had expected to be the grand jury's final witness.


Former President Donald Trump, left. adult film star Stormy Daniels, center. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, right. Alex Brandon/AP, left. Markus Schreiber/AP, center. Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/AP, right


Had that remained the plan, Cohen's testimony, which concluded last Wednesday, would have been quickly followed by deliberation and a vote.


But today's pause in the grand jury's activity — especially if the panel does take the rest of this week off — will likely delay the process into next week.


Grand juries convene in secret, and prosecutors are statutorily barred from discussing what they do.


The pause comes after unexpected testimony Monday by Robert Costello, who was allowed to address the grand jurors at the defense's request.


1 In a Wednesday post to Truth Social, Trump wrote that Bragg "is having a hard time with the Grand Jury, especially after the powerful testimony against him by Felon Cohen's highly respected former lawyer."


1 Prosecutors are barred from divulging grand jury details; Bragg's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


























British Media Downplays Risks of Depleted Uranium Ammo Now That Russians Are the Target

British Media Downplays Risks of Depleted Uranium Ammo Now That Russians Are the Target

British Media Downplays Risks of Depleted Uranium Ammo Now That Russians Are the Target




CCO//






Evidence has been mounting since the 1991 Gulf War that depleted uranium ammunition used by US forces and their allies causes cancer and birth defects. But now the same Western media that helped expose the risks is downplaying them as Ukraine is set to receive DU weapons.







The British mainstream media has abruptly changed its tune on the risks of depleted uranium (DU) munitions after the government announced it was sending them to Ukraine for use against Russian troops.


Junior Defence Minister Baroness Annabel Goldie confirmed to the House of Lords on Tuesday that the Ministry of Defence would supply Ukraine with 120m-calibre DU armour-piercing fin-stabilized discarding sabot (APFSDS) sub-calibre projectiles for the 14 Challenger 2 tanks it has pledged to Kiev.


Moscow warned that the move was a major escalation in NATO's proxy conflict with Russia that took the world one step closer to nuclear war.


"I can only say this: We are running out of red lines," said Russian Defence Minister Sergey Shoigu. "Another line has been crossed and there are fewer and fewer of them left."


President Vladimir Putin later noted that "the West really decided to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian, not in words, but in deed," and that Russia would be forced to "react accordingly" since "the collective West is already starting to use weapons with a nuclear component."


"The use of depleted uranium ammunition will dramatically reduce, or maybe even not preserve at all Ukraine's ability to produce high-quality uninfected food," warned Foreign Affairs Minister Sergey Lavrov. "As for our reaction, of course, we will take this into account in determining our actions."


But a report on the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) website repeated the British MoD's insistence that Russia was "deliberately trying to disinform" and that "any impact to personal health and the environment from the use of depleted uranium munitions is likely to be low." The state broadcaster quoted former British army tank commander Colonel Hamish de Breton-Gordon, who said it was "laughable" to link DU — a by-product of uranium enrichment to weapons grade and of the spent nuclear reactor fuel that also contains weaponizable plutonium — to nuclear weapons.







De Breton-Gordon called Putin's warning "classic disinformation" before claiming that the British DU tank rounds "contained only trace elements of depleted uranium." That was in contrast to the BBC's previous extensive reporting on the threats to heath from the radioactive and carcinogenic DU rounds.












Moralistic Guardians



200-year-old Liberal newspaper The Guardian has also exposed the dangers of DU munitions for decades — but this week tried to downplay Russia's concerns.


Its report on Tuesday, the title claimed Vladimir Putin merely "sought to exploit a British statement that it would supply Ukraine with tank shells made with depleted uranium."








The Guardian's Kiev-based defence and security editor Dan Sabbagh implied that Putin only responded to the British junior defence minister's statement after it "began to circulate on Russian social media channels."


"The Russian leader frequently makes nuclear-related threats, largely in an effort to persuade western countries to limit their interventions in the war in Ukraine, which was started by Moscow’s invasion last year," Sabbagh wrote.


The article, co-authored by aptly-named science editor Ian Sample, also quoted the MoD claim that depleted uranium "has nothing to do with nuclear weapons and capabilities."


It went on to downplay the same concerns about the munitions' radioactivity and toxicity that the paper has highlighted in the past.






DU is used in high-velocity dart-like projectiles due to its very high density — two-thirds heavier per cubic centimetre than lead — which increases armour penetration, as well as its pyrophoric property of igniting on impact.


They are produced in a range of calibres from the 25mm Bushmaster chain gun fitted to the Bradley infantry fighting vehicle — also supplied to Ukraine — and the 30mm GAU-8 Gatling cannon of the A-10 Warthog close support aircraft, up to those of tank guns like the 120mm L30 carried by the Challenger 2.


DU ammunition was heavily used by US forces and their allies in the 1991 Gulf War, the 2003 invasion of Iraq and the 1999 NATO offensive against Serbia in support of Kosovar separatist militants. Doctors have said the radioactive material — a by-product of spent nuclear fuel — left strewn around the country has caused horrific birth defects and increased rates of cancer.


A study published by the US federal National Institutes of Health in 2021 concluded that the evidence gathered "suggests possible associations between exposure to depleted uranium and adverse health outcomes among the Iraqi population."


Tungsten can also be used as a non-radioactive and less-toxic alternative to DU in armour-piercing projectiles. Serbian citizens have sued NATO over its use of around 15 tonnes of DU munitions in its war on the Balkan republic, but the US-led alliance has claimed it has legal immunity from litigation.


























Russia’s defense chief bestows awards on Su-27 pilots for intercepting US spy drone and China gives US advice on Ukraine

Russia’s defense chief bestows awards on Su-27 pilots for intercepting US spy drone and China gives US advice on Ukraine

Russia’s defense chief bestows awards on Su-27 pilots for intercepting US spy drone and China gives US advice on Ukraine




Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu (R)
©Russian Defence Ministry/TASS






Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu bestowed Orders of Courage on the Su-27 pilots for intercepting a US spy drone over the Black Sea, the Defense Ministry reported on Wednesday.







At a meeting with military commanders, Shoigu bestowed Gold Star medals and Orders of Courage on the Russian service members who had displayed heroism in the special military operation in Ukraine, the ministry said.


"In addition, the Orders of Courage were bestowed on the pilots of Su-27 planes who prevented an American MQ-9 unmanned aerial vehicle from violating the airspace temporarily restricted for flights for the purposes of the special military operation," the statement reads.


As Russia’s Defense Ministry reported earlier, the Russian Aerospace Forces’ airspace control capabilities spotted a flight by a US MQ-9 drone near the Crimean Peninsula on March 14. As the ministry explained, the American reconnaissance drone flew with its transponders switched off towards the Russian border and intruded into the area covered "by the temporary regime for the airspace use established for the purposes of the special military operation (in Ukraine) and brought to the notice of all international airspace users and published in accordance with international norms."


The US drone lost control "as a result of an abrupt maneuver" and crashed into the Black Sea waters while the Russian fighter jets scrambled to intercept the intruder did not employ their onboard armaments and did not enter into contract with the UAV, the ministry specified.


According to the US version, two Russian Su-27 fighter jets intercepted the MQ-9 reconnaissance drone over the Black Sea. Finally, as Washington claims, one of the fighters struck the drone’s propeller, causing it to crash.









China gives US advice on Ukraine



The US should stop “fanning the flames” of the conflict in Ukraine instead of making accusations against Beijing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin has said.


Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin
©AFP/Greg Baker


During a briefing on Wednesday, Wang responded to a statement by US National Security Council spokesman John Kirby, who said the previous day that he didn’t think “you can reasonably look at China as impartial in any way” when it comes to the fighting between Moscow and Kiev. Beijing has failed to condemn Russia’s military operation, while continuing to buy energy from the country, he added.


Kirby noted that Chinese President Xi Jinping “saw fit to fly all the way to Moscow” this week, but has never spoken to his Ukrainian counterpart, Vladimir Zelensky.


The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman rejected Kirby’s claims, stating that the US was itself too deeply involved in the conflict in Ukraine to accuse Beijing of being biased.


“The US side claims that China's stance isn’t impartial. But is it impartial to continuously supply weapons to the battlefield? Is it impartial to constantly escalate the conflict? Is it impartial to allow the effects of the crisis to spill over globally?” Wang said, referring to the Biden administration’s policies.








“We advise the American side to rethink its own stance on the Ukraine issue, turn away from the erroneous path of adding fuel to the fire, and stop shifting the blame to China,” he said.


Beijing has “no selfish motives on the Ukraine issue, has not stood idly by... or sought profit for itself,” the spokesman insisted. “What China has done boils down to one thing, that is, to promote peace talks.”


As for Xi’s trip to the Russian capital, which took place between Monday and Wednesday, Wang pointed out that this was “a journey of friendship, cooperation and peace, which has aroused positive responses in the international community.”


The Ukrainian crisis was among the top issues discussed between Vladimir Putin and Xi in Moscow, with the Russian president stressing that many provisions of the Chinese peace proposal were “consonant with the Russian stance and can be taken as a foundation for a peaceful settlement when they are ready for it in the West and in Kiev.” However, Putin pointed out that Moscow currently didn’t detect readiness from either the US, its allies or the Ukrainian government.