Thursday, 20 July 2023

'My Mates Have Died And Are Dying' in Ukraine - Australian Mercenary

'My Mates Have Died And Are Dying' in Ukraine - Australian Mercenary

'My Mates Have Died And Are Dying' in Ukraine - Australian Mercenary





©Sputnik / Konstantin Mikhalchevsky / Go to the mediabank






Moscow earlier recalled that all those foreigners, who are fighting on the side of Ukraine in the special operation zone, remain legitimate targets of the Russian military, "who successfully obliterate them."







Foreign mercenaries in Ukraine are threatened with repercussions for spreading information about some “incompetent” Ukrainian commanders, who are putting them in danger, a former Australian soldier currently serving with the Ukrainian International Legion has told an Australian radio station.


The former Aussie serviceman, who was only referred to by the call sign "Bush," singled out the leadership incompetence of some Ukrainian commanders, adding that some mercenaries have been threatened with jail for trying to leave Ukraine.


"The simple fact is that it is a meat grinder out there. My mates have died, and are dying. This is a matter of life and death and this needs to be solved, pronto,” he pointed out.


The Australian soldier of fortune admitted that he “has seen things out here that, from a military perspective, are beyond unacceptable and are unfortunately hurting Ukraine." He also argued that some mercenaries had not been paid at all for their service in Ukraine.


When asked whether he fears for his safety in speaking out, the man said, "Absolutely, 100 percent."


The Australian radio station also referred to a recent recorded exchange, in which “the Bush” reportedly tells a Ukrainian commander about a broken system that made it impossible “to do tasks as simple as transferring men from one unit to another.”


In the recording, “The Bush” also bemoans the fact that his mates’ concerns about particular commanders within the Ukrainian International Legion are being ignored. "We will not continue to serve in a military that mistreats us," he was heard telling the commander, who reacts by admitting that Legion members are angry and frustrated, according to the Australian radio station.


Separately, the media outlet cited “the Bush” as saying that although some Australian members of the Ukrainian International Legion are more experienced in operating the Australian-made Bushmasters armored personnel carriers that were recently delivered to Kiev, they are prevented from using these vehicles. “We have been expressly ordered that we cannot use this equipment — only the Ukrainians can use it." the former Australian soldier said.


“The Bush” was echoed by former Australian Army officer Glenn Kolomeitz, who told the Australian radio station that foreign mercenaries in Ukraine “are threatened with jail and all manner of nonsense," if they ask to leave.


Kolomeitz described some of the threats received by Ukrainian International Legion members as "horrendous" and "shocking."


He also accused Ukrainian commanders of "disregarding the planning and just sending troops in, Ukrainians and Westerners, into these battles without the benefit of these operational plans." According to Kolomeitz, "That's seeing a lot of people being killed to little effect, to little battlefield effect."


The Australian radio station quoted both Bush and Kolomeitz as saying that “a lack of confidence in the leadership of some commanders of the Legion is a pervasive problem, with devastating effects.”


Both interviews come after Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova told reporters earlier this month that Moscow witnesses the maximum activity of foreign private military companies (PMCs) in the Russian special operation zone, who are “involved in crimes committed by Ukrainian neo-Nazis.”


Zakharova added that “foreigners fighting on the side of the Kiev regime, as well as the national governments covering them” should know that Western mercenaries fighting in the special operation zone remain legitimate targets of our military, who regularly and successfully destroy them.”


The remarks followed Russia’s Ministry of Defense (MoD) saying in a statement that since the beginning of the Russian special military operation, at least 11,675 foreign mercenaries from 84 countries have arrived in Ukraine to fight against Russian forces. Currently, just 2,029 mercenaries remain in the ranks of the Ukrainian army, according to the statement.


The MoD noted that Kiev has stepped up its recruitment of mercenaries in the US and Canada, facilitated by the CIA and private military companies controlled by it.


"Due to a decline in interest in dying 'for the Kiev regime' in Poland, the UK, and other European countries, recruitment activities in the US and Canada have intensified," the ministry said, adding that the regime uses foreign mercenaries as "cannon fodder."


"The Russian armed forces will continue to destroy foreign mercenaries in the course of the special military operation, regardless of their location on the territory of Ukraine," the MoD underlined.



















































google.com, pub-0655609370809761, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

CTES Elog Bimbel - Daftar bimbel Tes SMAKBO

google.com, pub-0655609370809761, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0


























































Trump is denied a new trial in E. Jean Carroll's sexual assault and defamation case

Trump is denied a new trial in E. Jean Carroll's sexual assault and defamation case

Trump is denied a new trial in E. Jean Carroll's sexual assault and defamation case





©AP Photo/Craig Ruttle






A federal court judge in New York on Wednesday denied Donald Trump's bid for a new trial on E. Jean Carroll's civil sexual assault and defamation claims against the former president.







In a 59-page ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan also denied Trump's request to reduce the $5 million in damages a jury awarded Carroll earlier this year.







Kaplan wrote that Trump's arguments that the $2 million she was awarded on the sexual assault was "excessive" is "entirely unpersuasive."


"There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s sexual assault damages. And Mr. Trump’s arguments with respect to the defamation damages are no stronger," Kaplan wrote.


An attorney for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The former president has denied assaulting Carroll and has a separate appeal of the verdict pending.


Trump's argument for a new trial or reduced award centered on the nine-member jury's finding in May that Carroll, 79, had not proven "by a preponderance of the evidence" that Trump had raped her in the dressing room of a Manhattan department store in the mid-1990s. The jury did find Trump liable on another element of Carroll's battery claim: sexual abuse.


Trump's lawyers contended that finding could have been based on allegations including “groping of Plaintiff’s breasts through clothing or similar conduct, which is a far cry from rape,” and that the damages award was therefore excessive.


Judge rejects Trump's bid to move New York hush money case to federal court Kaplan called that argument "frivolous" because there was "no evidence whatever that Mr. Trump groped Ms. Carroll’s breasts, through her clothing or otherwise."


The magazine writer testified that Trump's only sexual contact with her was when he penetrated her with his fingers and then his penis.


"The jury’s finding of sexual abuse therefore necessarily implies that it found that Mr. Trump forcibly penetrated her," and the damages are therefore not excessive, the judge wrote.


Carroll attorney Roberta Kaplan said in a statement that her client "looks forward to receiving the $5 million in damages that the jury awarded her."


"She also looks forward to continuing to hold Trump accountable for what he did to her at the trial" for another civil defamation case against Trump that's scheduled to begin in January of next year.


That case involves statements Trump made about Carroll while he was president and after the $5 million jury verdict, including calling her claims a financially motivated "hoax."


Trump, meanwhile, has filed a counterclaim against Carroll alleging she defamed him by continuing to say he raped her in public statements after the jury verdict.


In his ruling Wednesday, Kaplan indicated that may be a losing argument.


He noted that rape in New York criminal law "applies only to vaginal penetration by a penis," a definition that is "far narrower than the meaning of ‘rape’ in common modern parlance, its definition in some dictionaries, in some federal and state criminal statutes, and elsewhere."


"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was 'raped' within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump 'raped' her as many people commonly understand the word 'rape.' Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that," he wrote.




















































google.com, pub-0655609370809761, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

CTES Elog Bimbel - Daftar bimbel Tes SMAKBO

google.com, pub-0655609370809761, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0





















































Saudi crown prince: We look forward to benefiting from joint GCC-Central Asian cooperation

Saudi crown prince: We look forward to benefiting from joint GCC-Central Asian cooperation

Saudi crown prince: We look forward to benefiting from joint GCC-Central Asian cooperation





Leaders from countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council and Central Asia pose for a family photo in Jeddah. (SPA)






Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman said the Kingdom looks forward to working together with Gulf Cooperation Council and Central Asian countries to benefit from available opportunities for joint cooperation in all fields.







Speaking at the GCC-Central Asia Summit that was held in Jeddah on Wednesday, the crown prince said that the challenges the world faces today require all efforts to enhance cooperation between GCC and Central Asian countries to achieve security and stability in the region.


“We stress the importance of respecting the sovereignty, independence and values of states, non-interference in their internal affairs, and the need to intensify joint efforts to confront everything that affects energy security and global food supply chains,” Prince Mohammed said.


Earlier, he welcomed the heads of delegations participating in a summit of Gulf Cooperation Council and Central Asian countries.





Participants in the Jeddah summit included the presidents of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan.


From the GCC side, the Emir of Qatar Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani, the Crown Prince of Kuwait Sheikh Meshal Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, the Vice President of the UAE Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid attended.


Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman greets the Vice President of the UAE Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid in Jeddah on Wednesday. (SPA)


Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman greets the representative of Oman’s sultan Sayyid Asaad bin Tariq Al-Said in Jeddah on Wednesday. (SPA)


Oman and Bahrain’s rulers were represented by Sayyid Asaad bin Tariq Al-Said and Sheikh Nasser bin Hamad Al-Khalifa respectively.


Sheikh Nasser praised the active role played by the Kingdom in enhancing cooperation and coordination among GCC countries and consolidating friendship and joint cooperation with other countries.



Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman greets the Crown Prince of Kuwait Sheikh Meshal Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah in Jeddah on Wednesday. (SPA)


The President of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev speaks at the GCC-Central Asia Summit in Jeddah on Wednesday. (SPA)


















































google.com, pub-0655609370809761, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

CTES Elog Bimbel - Daftar bimbel Tes SMAKBO

google.com, pub-0655609370809761, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
























































Stanford President to Resign After Reports Findings of Shortages in His Research

Stanford President to Resign After Reports Findings of Shortages in His Research

Stanford President to Resign After Reports Findings of Shortages in His Research





Marc Tessier-Lavigne at Stanford University in Stanford, California, on 21 October 2016. Photograph: Dan Honda/AP






The president of Stanford University, Marc Tessier-Lavigne, has announced he will resign after concerns about the integrity of his research.







Following months of intense scrutiny of his scientific work, Marc Tessier-Lavigne announced Wednesday that he would resign as president of Stanford University after an independent review of his research found significant flaws in studies he supervised going back decades.


The review, conducted by an outside panel of scientists, refuted the most serious claim involving Dr. Tessier-Lavigne’s work — that an important 2009 Alzheimer’s study was the subject of an investigation that found falsified data and that Dr. Tessier-Lavigne had covered it up.


Tessier-Lavigne announced his plans to step down on 31 August in a letter to students and staff on Wednesday.


Tessier-Lavigne said he was stepping down because he expected continued debate about his ability to lead the university.


“I’ve never submitted a scientific paper without firmly believing that the data were correct and accurately presented,” he said in a statement. But he added that he should have been more diligent in seeking corrections regarding his work


The panel concluded that the claims “appear to be mistaken” and that there was no evidence of falsified data or that Dr. Tessier-Lavigne had otherwise engaged in fraud.


But the review also stated that the 2009 study, conducted while he was an executive at the biotech company Genentech, had “multiple problems” and “fell below customary standards of scientific rigor and process,” especially for such a potentially important paper.


As a result of the review, Dr. Tessier-Lavigne was expected to request substantial corrections in the 2009 paper, published in Nature, as well as another Nature study. He also said he would request retraction of a 1999 paper that appeared in the journal Cell and two others that appeared in Science in 2001.


Stanford is known for its leadership in scientific research, and even though the claims involved work published before Dr. Tessier-Lavigne’s arrival at the university in 2016, the accusations reflected poorly on the university’s integrity.


In a statement describing his reasons for resigning, Dr. Tessier-Lavigne said, “I expect there may be ongoing discussion about the report and its conclusions, at least in the near term, which could lead to debate about my ability to lead the university into the new academic year.”


Dr. Tessier-Lavigne will relinquish the presidency at the end of August but remain at the university as a tenured professor of biology. As president, he started the university’s first new school in 70 years, the climate-focused Doerr School of Sustainability. A noted neuroscientist, he has published more than 220 papers, primarily on the cause and treatment of degenerative brain diseases.


The university named Richard Saller, a professor of European studies, as interim president, effective Sept. 1.


The Stanford panel’s 89-page report, based on more than 50 interviews and a review of more than 50,000 documents, concluded that members of Dr. Tessier-Lavigne’s labs engaged in inappropriate manipulation of research data or deficient scientific practices, resulting in significant flaws in five papers that listed Dr. Tessier-Lavigne as the principal author.


In several instances, the panel found, Dr. Tessier-Lavigne took insufficient steps to correct mistakes, and it questioned his decision not to seek a correction in the 2009 paper after follow-up studies revealed that its key finding was wrong.


The flaws cited by the panel involved a total of 12 papers, including seven in which Dr. Tessier-Lavigne was listed as co-author.


The accusations against Dr. Tessier-Lavigne, 63, had first surfaced years ago on PubPeer, an online crowdsourcing site for publishing and discussing scientific work.


But they resurfaced after the student newspaper, The Stanford Daily, published a series of articles questioning the work produced in laboratories overseen by Dr. Tessier-Lavigne. In November, The Stanford Daily reported claims that images were manipulated in published papers listing Dr. Tessier-Lavigne as either lead author or co-author.


In February, The Stanford Daily published more serious claims of fraud involving the 2009 paper that Dr. Tessier-Lavigne published while a senior scientist at Genentech. It said an investigation by Genentech found that the study contained falsified data, and that Dr. Tessier-Lavigne tried to keep its findings hidden.


It also said that a postdoctoral researcher who had worked on the study had been caught by Genentech falsifying data. Both Dr. Tessier-Lavigne and the former researcher, now a medical doctor practicing in Florida, strongly denied the claims, which relied heavily on unnamed sources.


The review panel said that The Stanford Daily’s claim that “Genentech had conducted a fraud investigation and made a finding of fraud” in the study “appear to be mistaken.” No such investigation had been conducted, the report said, but it noted that the panel was unable to identify some unnamed sources cited in the story.


Kaushikee Nayudu, the editor in chief and president of The Stanford Daily, said in a statement on Wednesday that the newspaper stood by its reporting.


In response to the newspaper’s initial report about manipulated studies in November, Stanford’s board of trustees formed a special committee to review the claims, led by Carol Lam, a Stanford trustee and former federal prosecutor. The special committee then engaged Mark Filip, a former federal judge in Illinois, and his law firm, Kirkland & Ellis, to run the review.


In January, it was announced that Mr. Filip had enlisted the five-member scientific panel — which included a Nobel laureate and a former Princeton president — to examine the claims from a scientific perspective.


Genentech had touted the 2009 study as a breakthrough, with Dr. Tessier-Lavigne characterizing the findings during a presentation to Genentech investors as a completely new and different way of looking at the Alzheimer’s disease process.


The study focused on what it said was the previously unknown role of a brain protein — Death Receptor 6 — in the development of Alzheimer’s.


As has been the case with many new theories in Alzheimer’s, a central finding of the study was found to be incorrect. Following several years of attempts to duplicate the results, Genentech ultimately abandoned the line of inquiry.


Dr. Tessier-Lavigne left Genentech in 2011 to head Rockefeller University, but, along with the company, published subsequent work acknowledging the failure to confirm key parts of the research.


More recently, Dr. Tessier-Lavigne told the industry publication Stat News that there had been inconsistencies in the results of experiments, which he blamed on impure protein samples.


The failure of his laboratory to assure the samples’ purity was one of the scientific process problems cited by the panel, even though it found that Dr. Tessier-Lavigne was unaware of those problems at the time. It called Dr. Tessier-Lavigne’s decision to not correct the original paper as “suboptimal” but within the bounds of scientific practice.


In his statement, Dr. Tessier-Lavigne said that he had earlier tried to issue corrections to the Cell and Science papers but that Cell had declined to publish a correction and Science failed to publish one after agreeing to do so.


The panel’s findings echoed a report released in April by Genentech, which said its own internal review of The Stanford Daily’s claims did not find any evidence of “fraud, fabrication, or other intentional wrongdoing.”


Most of Stanford panel’s report is a detailed appendix that analyzes images in 12 published papers in which Dr. Tessier-Lavigne served either as author or co-author, some dating back 20 years.


In the papers, the panel found multiple instances of images that had been duplicated or spliced but concluded that Dr. Tessier-Lavigne had not participated in the manipulation, was not aware of them at the time, and had not been reckless in failing to detect them.


Dr. Matthew Schrag, an assistant professor of neurology at Vanderbilt University who in February flagged problems with the 2009 Alzheimer’s study, said that the study’s publication illustrated how scientific journals sometimes give prominent researchers the benefit of the doubt while vetting their studies.


“I have some mixed feelings about the heat that he’s taking, because I think that it’s extremely unlikely he was the key player at fault here,” Dr. Schrag said. “I think he had a responsibility to do more probably than he did, but that also doesn’t mean he wasn’t trying to do the right thing.”
























































google.com, pub-0655609370809761, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

CTES Elog Bimbel - Daftar bimbel Tes SMAKBO

google.com, pub-0655609370809761, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0






















































Keraton Surakarta kirab tujuh pusaka pada malam 1 Sura

Keraton Surakarta kirab tujuh pusaka pada malam 1 Sura

Keraton Surakarta kirab tujuh pusaka pada malam 1 Sura





Kerbau bule atau kebo bule yang dikeramatkan di Keraton Kasunanan Surakarta. (Shutterstock/Ricky Kurniawan)






Keraton Kasunanan Surakarta Hadiningrat menggelar kirab tujuh pusaka pada malam 1 Sura yang jatuh pada pergantian hari Rabu, 19/07/2023, menuju Kamis.







Sejumlahwarga memadati Kori Kamandungan Keraton Solo. Mereka duduk dengan rapi di sepanjang Kori Kamandungan


Sebelum pusaka dikeluarkan dari dalam keraton, seorang abdi dalem wanita keluar. Tepat di depan pintu utama keraton atau yang disebut Kori Kamandungan, abdi dalem tersebut terlihat menyalakan dupa yang dibakar di atas tungku sembari berdoa.


Di bagian halaman luar, sejumlah abdi dalem pria mulai menyebarkan ubi untuk kerbau yang akan bertugas mengawal sejumlah pusaka keraton. Tepat setengah jam sebelum pusaka dikeluarkan, terlihat lima ekor kerbau atau disebut juga kebo bule datang dari arah alun-alun kidul yang selama ini menjadi kandang sehari-hari.


Usai makan ubi yang sebelumnya sudah disiapkan, pada pukul 24.00 WIB bertepatan dengan dibunyikannya lonceng sebanyak 12 kali, kerbau mulai jalan untuk memimpin kirab sekaligus mengawal pusaka.


Terlihat putra mahkota Keraton Surakarta Kanjeng Gusti Pangeran Haryo Purboyo bersama dengan kerabat keraton juga mengikuti kirab atau topo bisu.


Di belakang rombongan terlihat satu per satu pusaka mulai dikeluarkan. Setiap pusaka dikawal oleh rombongan peserta kirab sekaligus abdi dalem yang membawa oncor serta payung keraton


Kirab tersebut mengambil rute Supit Urang, Jalan Pakubuwana, Gapura Gladag, Jalan Jenderal Sudirman, Jalan Mayor Kusmanto, Jalan Kapten Mulyadi, Jalan Veteran, Jalan Yos Sudarso, Jalan Slamet Riyadi dan kembali ke Keraton Solo.


Mengenai ritual malam 1 Sura di Keraton Surakarta, Pengageng Sasana Wilapa Keraton Surakarta Kanjeng Raden Aryo Dani Nur Adiningrat mengatakan prosesi dimulai dengan tradisi wilujengan pada pukul 19.00 WIB. Selanjutnya ada peringatan haul Pakubuwono X yang meninggal pada malam 1 Sura.


"Jam 22.30 WIB mulai dilakukan persiapan. Abdi dalem dan sentono dalem yang dapat tugas ngampil dan bongkar berjajar, dibagikan sangsang atau kalung bunga melati, setelah itu gajah nguling atau hiasan telinga yang menandakan dia utusan raja untuk bawa pusaka," katanya.


Selanjutnya pusaka yang disimpan di gedong pusaka dikeluarkan satu per satu. Sesampainya di pelataran, pembawa pusaka didampingi oleh abdi dalem yang membawa tombak dan oncor.


"Lalu dibuat grup-grup untuk kemudian dikirabkan," imbuhnya.


Ia menambahkan ketika iring-iringan kirab berangkat, ada ritual doa di kawasan sakral keraton yang disebut bandengan. Selain itu, juga dilakukan shalat hajat dan shalat malam di masjid dalam keraton. "Jadi, ada yang berdoa lewat kirab, meditasi," tambahnya.


Sementara itu, tidak terlihat pejabat nasional yang turut hadir, termasuk Wali Kota Solo Gibran Rakabuming Raka yang kali ini tidak datang mengikuti kirab. Meski demikian, ada salah satu tokoh yang terlihat hadir, yakni putra Gubernur Jawa Tengah, Alam Ganjar.





















































google.com, pub-0655609370809761, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

CTES Elog Bimbel - Daftar bimbel Tes SMAKBO

google.com, pub-0655609370809761, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0