Wednesday, 15 May 2024

Watch Russian Solntsepyok Heavy Flamethrower System Destroy Ukrainian Strongholds Near Chasov Yar

Watch Russian Solntsepyok Heavy Flamethrower System Destroy Ukrainian Strongholds Near Chasov Yar

Watch Russian Solntsepyok Heavy Flamethrower System Destroy Ukrainian Strongholds Near Chasov Yar











Russia's TOS-1A Solntsepyok (lit. “Scorching Sunlight”) is a powerful and devastating multiple rocket launcher system designed to deliver a high volume of high-explosive incendiary (HEI) rockets capable of causing massive damage to enemy forces and infrastructure.







The Russian Defense Ministry has released footage showing TOS-1A Solntsepyok heavy flamethrower system crews from the Ivanovo Airborne Troops destroying Ukrainian strongholds on the outskirts of Chasov Yar, the Russian Defense Ministry said.


"Crews of the TOS-1A Solntsepyok heavy flamethrower systems of the Ivanovo paratroopers destroyed fortified infantry positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the outskirts of Chasov Yar. The successful work of our heavy flamethrower systems allowed the assault groups of the Ivanovo paratroopers to occupy and clear the Ukrainian Armed Forces strongholds with minimal losses," the ministry said.


Chasov Yar is located 15 kilometers (9 miles) west of the city of Artyomovsk.


Earlier, Yan Gagin, an adviser to acting DPR Head Denis Pushilin, said that the Russian Armed Forces had entered the suburbs of the city of Chasov Yar in the Donetsk People's Republic (DPR), which has been heavily fortified and mined over the past year.


The city of Chasov Yar holds significant operational and strategic importance due to its location on a dominant height that provides control over the path to the largest agglomeration in Donbass still under Ukrainian control – the Slavyansk-Kramatorsk area and Konstantinovka.



Watch Russian Su-34 Fighter-Bombers Strike Enemy Units



Russia’s Su-34 is a multirole fighter-bomber designed to perform a variety of missions, including air-to-air combat, ground attack, and reconnaissance. The Su-34 is known for its high speed, maneuverability, and advanced avionics.







The Russian Defense Ministry has released footage showing Su-34 crews carrying out powerful strikes against enemy units. The pilots use high-explosive aerial bombs with universal planning and correction modules, which allow performing precise strikes from outside the enemy's air defense kill zone.


The footage shows the destruction of a Ukrainian command post and personnel in Battlegroup Vostok’s area of responsibility.



Watch Russian troops destroy Ukrainian multiple rocket launcher



A clip showing a Russian high-precision drone strike against a Ukrainian Soviet-made BM-21 Grad multiple rocket launcher has emerged on social media.






The weapon system was discovered by Russian troops somewhere in Ukraine’s Kharkov Region, according to the Telegram channel that published the clip. Moscow’s forces have been engaged in offensive operations in the region in recent days. In the video, a drone operator can be seen pinpointing the rocket launcher’s location and locking his kamikaze UAV on the target before striking it.


The clip ends with the Grad going up in flames. The strike resulted in a massive explosion since the launcher was apparently fully loaded. According to some media reports, Russian troops in Kharkov Region have been successfully using kamikaze Lancet drones to isolate Ukrainian forces in the area and strip them of fire support by specifically targeting artillery and missile launchers.


The Russian Defense Ministry has not commented on the reports or provided details about the tactics used during the operation. The ministry also did not list the Grad system among the losses suffered by Kiev’s forces over the past 24 hours.






The ministry did report in its daily briefing on Telegram that Russian forces continue to advance in Kharkov Region, adding that the village of Bugrovatka has become the latest settlement to fall under Russian control in the area. Over the past 24 hours, Kiev’s troops lost more than 130 soldiers, as well as two armored vehicles, a Czech-made Vampire multiple rocket launcher, a German-made Gepard self-propelled anti-aircraft gun, and several artillery pieces in the northeastern Ukrainian region alone, the statement said.


Kiev’s military intelligence chief, Kirill Budanov, recently admitted that the situation is “on the edge.” “Every hour this situation moves toward critical,” he told the New York Times on Monday.


Russian troops have seized numerous villages in the northern part of Kharkov Region since the start of their offensive last week. The area has been used by Kiev for months to launch cross-border attacks into Russia’s Belgorod Region.



Watch Russian Assault Squads Liberate Village From Ukrainian Militants



While the Kiev regime keeps hoping that it might be saved by some additional handouts from the West and another hundred thousand press-ganged Ukrainians, Russian forces continue their march across the Ukrainian conflict zone, freeing settlement after settlement.






This short video offers a glimpse of how Russian forces liberated the village of Berdychi in the Donetsk People’s Republic. At first, the Ukrainian garrison offered stiff resistance, one of the Russian soldiers who participated in the battle for the village recalls.


However, once the Kiev regime militants realized what they were up against, their resolve faltered and they started falling back, eventually surrendering control of the village.


















Tuesday, 14 May 2024

US Destroyer Quits Red Sea, Sails Home After Houthis Warn of Unimaginable Major Escalation

US Destroyer Quits Red Sea, Sails Home After Houthis Warn of Unimaginable Major Escalation

US Destroyer Quits Red Sea, Sails Home After Houthis Warn of Unimaginable Major Escalation





©AFP 2023/FELIX GARZA






Houthi’s unrelenting campaign of ship hijackings and missile and drone attacks targeting Israel, US, and UK-linked commercial vessels has resulted in a two-thirds drop in traffic through the strategic Red Sea chokepoint since December. The militia has vowed to end its campaign if Israel halts its military incursion into Gaza.







The USS Carney destroyer – the warship which became the face of the US Navy’s anti-Houthi operations last fall, left the Red Sea and arrived in Norfolk, Virginia after a grueling, months-long deployment in the Middle East.


The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer was deployed for "routine operations" with the US 5th and 6th Fleets in late September 2023, but quickly found itself in the center of a hornet’s nest of escalating Middle East tensions in October after Hamas' surprise attack on Israel, and the subsequent Israeli aerial bombardment and ground invasion of Gaza.


The USS Carney became the first US warship to engage Houthi drones and missiles, with the Yemeni militia attempting to strike Israel starting on October 19, and the American warship deployed to shield Tel Aviv. The militia switched tactics in November, setting up a semi-blockade of the Red and Arabian Seas, unilaterally closing the bodies of water to all vessels with suspected "Israeli links."


The warship escorted commercial vessels in an attempt to shield them from Houthi strikes, and itself became targeted repeatedly by drones and missiles. Beginning in January, the destroyer began firing its cruise missiles at targets inside Yemen in a desperate bid to weaken the Houthis’ strike potential.


“I'm very proud of what the Carney team has done since September,” said US Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Lisa Franchetti (cheering to herself and her fleet) at a ceremony welcoming the warship to Norfolk. “Called into action on your first day entering the US 5th Fleet, you fought 51 battles in 6 months,” the admiral said.


The Navy did not elaborate on when exactly the Carney left the Red Sea before beginning the long trek across the Atlantic. After resupply in Norfolk, the warship is expected to sail to its home base at Naval Station Mayport outside Jacksonville, Florida.


The USS Carney is the latest warship from two separate Western coalitions – the US-UK-led Operation Prosperity Guardian and the EU’s Operation Aspides, to leave the Red Sea and head home. Last month, German Navy frigate the Hessen left the area and sailed back to Germany as Houthi leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi promised European countries safe passage if they were "not heading towards the Israeli enemy.” The EU-led operation has been far less belligerent than its US and UK-led counterpart so far, with EU warships not attacking targets inside Yemen.


Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Strategic Forces Chairman Angus King warned at a hearing last week that US missile defenses have proven exorbitantly costly and ineffective not only against strategic adversaries like Russia, China, and Iran, but even against the Houthis, whose ability to churn out cheap missiles and drones are contrasted by the price tag of the American missile interceptors designed to stop them.


“One missile to intercept an incoming [strategic] missile is $80 million,” King told gathered DoD officials. “Well in the Red Sea, the Houthis are sending $20,000 drones and we’re shooting them down with missiles that cost $4.3 million. The math doesn’t work on that, gentlemen. It just doesn’t work. What are we thinking?” King, an advocate of directed energy weapon-based defenses, asked.



Unimaginable Escalation



Houthi military spokesman Yahya Sare’e warned at a press conference on Monday that the militia would escalate its campaign to a level the enemy can’t even imaginable if Israel and its allies continue to cross Yemen’s “red lines.”


“Gaza is a red line for us, a red line. Our causes, holy sites, and our Islam are red lines, and we will not compromise on them,” Sare’e said.


“We can target things that the enemy hasn’t thought of and can’t imagine, things that neither the Yemeni people nor the people of the (Arab and Muslim World) can imagine,” he warned. “By God’s will and strength, we will reach the fifth and sixth stages (of anti-Israeli operations, ed.) if the enemy continues its aggression on Gaza.”


Sare’e did not elaborate on what these hitherto "unimaginable" strikes may entail. However, earlier this month, the official announced the start of a “fourth phase” of Houthi operations against Israel, including the targeting of all ships heading to Israel’s Mediterranean Sea ports from “any area within our reach.”


Last week, the Center for International Maritime Security, a Maryland-based security affairs think tank, admitted that Western naval operations in the Red Sea have been “hampered by various shortcomings,” including “ammunition shortages, a lack of coordination between allied nations, as well as deficient equipment.”


“It is questionable at best whether the current naval operations can become a success on the strategic level,” the think tank said, noting that the military effort has been “characterized by complicated coordination on the political level, virtually non-existent broader engagement with Houthi leaders, as well as a lack of clearly identified – and achievable – aims.”


Comparing the timing of the US and European-led anti-Houthi operations against the backdrop of declining maritime traffic through the Bab el Mandeb strait, the think tank admitted that “so far, military operations have not led to a recovery in maritime traffic levels” through the region.





















Why are social media users blocking celebrities over Israel’s Gaza war?

Why are social media users blocking celebrities over Israel’s Gaza war?

Why are social media users blocking celebrities over Israel’s Gaza war?





A pro-Palestine protester writes Gaza on a memoriam near Central Park during a march on the outskirts of the Met Gala [Alex Kent/Getty Images via AFP]






The growing protest efforts against Israel’s war on Gaza have now spawned a cyberspace movement that has erupted in the past few days, targeting celebrities who are seen as being insensitive towards, or even supportive of, the death and destruction in the Palestinian enclave.







The campaign that took off after the Met Gala on May 6 has earned the names: Blockout 2024, celebrity block list and digitine. The idea is to block famous celebrities on social media networks such as Instagram, X and TikTok.


But what’s it all about, why are parallels to the French Revolution coming up, does blocking a celebrity hurt them, and is the campaign seeing any impact?



What is Blockout 2024?



The Blockout 2024 is an online movement where social media users are carrying out a digital boycott of famous celebrities ranging from Hollywood actors to social media influencers for their silence on Israel’s war on Gaza, or in some cases, their purported support for the war.


Various TikTok, Instagram and X users have begun circulating lists of celebrities and their businesses to block.


The point of the move is to reduce the earnings the celebrities make through ads on social media platforms.





Why was this year’s Met Gala so controversial?



The Blockout movement was set off by this year’s Met Gala, which took place in New York on May 6.


Social media users were upset when images of the lavishly dressed celebrities surfaced online at the annual fundraiser.


They pointed out that some of these celebrities had never made online statements or addressed the continuing war on Gaza, where Israel’s relentless bombardment has killed more than 35,000 people, most of them women and children.





The ‘let them eat cake’ moment



On May 7, a video surfaced of TikTok influencer Haley Kalil, lip-syncing the words “let them eat cake”, outside the Met Gala. Kalil has 9.9 million followers on her TikTok account @haleyybaylee.





uted to Marie Antoinette, the queen of France during the French Revolution, have in popular imagination become synonymous with an elite so disconnected with the lives of citizens unable to find even bread that they suggest cake as an alternative.


Kalil’s video stirred anger because of the backdrop of the starvation crisis in Gaza. Insufficient food has been on the rise over the seven months of war.


Only two days before the Met Gala, on May 4, Cindy McCain, the head of the United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) said in a news interview that northern Gaza is experiencing “full blown famine”.


Users online have now started calling the Blockout, the “digitine” or the digital guillotine, leaning into the French Revolution reference.





Kalil issued an apology video on May 10 on her TikTok account. She said that she did not have an actual invite to the Met Gala and was involved in the event only as a host with E! News. She justified her use of the audio by saying that it was a trending audio on TikTok.


“I am not informed enough to talk about it in a meaningful or educational way,” she said in the apology video in response to questions about why she is not talking about what is happening in Gaza. She did not mention “Palestine”, “Gaza” or “Israel” in the video.





How does blocking a celebrity affect them?



Besides Kalil, other celebrities on the blocklists include Israeli actor and former soldier Gal Gadot, American media personality and socialite Kim Kardashian, American actors Zendaya and Noah Schnapp; American singer Taylor Swift and British singer Harry Styles.


While there have been online movements in the past to unfollow some of the celebrities that are now being blocked, experts have said blocking is more effective as a protest strategy than unfollowing.


The effect of unfollowing on a celebrity’s overall audience and engagement metrics is minimal, Eddy Borges-Rey, an associate professor in residence at Northwestern University in Qatar told Al Jazeera. Borges-Rey’s research work examines social media and algorithms


“Social media celebrities heavily rely on high visibility and engagement to attract and maintain advertising deals,” he said, adding that when someone unfollows a celebrity, they simply stop seeing the celebrity’s posts in their feed. The content can still indirectly show up through their search pages or algorithm-driven feeds such as the Instagram Explore page or the “For You” pages on TikTok and X.


Since even non-followers view the celebrity’s content if they have not blocked the celebrity, this does not significantly hurt the celebrity’s reach.


On the other hand, “if someone blocks the celebrity, they completely cut off all interaction with their content,” said Borges-Rey.


This decreases the celebrity’s audience size, leading social media algorithms to deprioritise their content. As more people block a celebrity, their posts become less visible across the platform, even to those users who have not blocked the celebrities.


“A reduction in visibility can lead advertisers to perceive the celebrity as less valuable, potentially cutting back on the amount they are willing to pay for ads on the celebrity’s profile, thereby directly affecting their ad revenue,” he added.



How have people reacted to the Blockout?



While many social media users online have been proponents and participants of the movement, others have described it as an example of performative activism.





Some have also suggested that posts about the Blockout, by crowding social media, are diverting attention from updates and information about what is actually going on in Palestine, as well as fundraisers for Gaza.





Has the Blockout made a difference so far?



While the Blockout started only a few days ago and the number of people who have blocked a particular account does not show, celebrities have started to lose followers.


On Saturday, NPR reported that Taylor Swift lost roughly 300,000 followers on TikTok and about 50,000 followers on Instagram over the past week.





"They [celebrities] live off of our attention,” an X user posted. “If they don’t have any, they cease to exert their influence.”





















Petugas gabungan tangkap puluhan preman dan juru parkir liar - Warta Sukabumi

Petugas gabungan tangkap puluhan preman dan juru parkir liar - Warta Sukabumi

Petugas gabungan tangkap puluhan preman dan juru parkir liar - Warta Sukabumi





Petugas gabungan dari Satuan Reserse Kriminal (Satreskrim) Polres Sukabumi Kota bersama Dinas Perhubungan serta Dinas Polisi Pamong Praja dan Pemadam Kebakaran Kota Sukabumi saat melakukan razia preman dan juru parkir liar di wilayah Kota Sukabumi, Jawa Barat, Senin (13/5/2024). ANTARA/Aditya Rohman/aa.






Satuan Reserse Kriminal (Satreskrim) Polres Sukabumi Kota bersama Dinas Perhubungan dan Dinas Polisi Pamong Praja dan Pemadam Kebakaran Kota Sukabumi melakukan penertiban parkir liar dan aksi premanisme yang terjadi di beberapa lokasi di wilayah hukum Polres Sukabumi Kota, Senin 13 Mei 2024 siang. Sebanyak 30 orang juru parkir liar dan preman diamankan tim gabungan di beberapa ruas jalan raya maupun minimarket.







"Ada 30 orang yang kami tangkap di beberapa lokasi di Kota Sukabumi, Jawa Barat hari ini. Mereka dicurigai sebagai preman dan juru parkir liar," kata Kasat Reskrim Polres Sukabumi Kota AKP Bagus Panuntun di Mapolres Sukabumi Kota, Senin.


Menurut Bagus, puluhan preman dan juru parkir liar itu ditangkap setelah pihaknya menerima pengaduan masyarakat terkait maraknya juru parkir liar dan aksi premanisme, sehingga petugas gabungan langsung menindak lanjuti dengan melakukan penyisiran di beberapa lokasi di Kota Sukabumi yang dicurigai tempat berkumpulnya mereka.


Puluhan preman dan juru parkir liar yang terjaring razia gabungan tersebut langsung digiring ke Mapolres Sukabumi Kota untuk dilakukan pendataan, pembinaan serta membuat surat pernyataan agar tidak melakukan hal yang sama seperti meminta uang secara paksa di jalan hingga membuat resah masyarakat.


Operasi gabungan ini bertujuan untuk memberikan rasa aman dan nyaman kepada masyarakat, karena keberadaan mereka sudah meresahkan dan tentunya mengganggu pengguna jalan.


"Sejauh ini kami belum menerima laporan terkait dugaan aksi pemerasan maupun premanisme yang dilakukan oleh oknum di beberapa ruas jalan maupun minimarket. Tetapi keberadaan orang yang diduga merupakan preman dan juru parkir liar sudah meresahkan warga," tambahnya.


Selain itu, Bagus mengatakan keberadaan juru parkir liar yang mangkal di beberapa minimarket dan jalan raya sudah membuat resah sehingga masyarakat mengadu ke pihaknya untuk dilakukan penertiban.


Dari hasil pemeriksaan dan keterangan saksi, juru parkir liar yang berada di sejumlah minimarket dan jalan memang dalam menjalankan aksinya tidak memaksa apalagi sampai mengancam keselamatan warga, hanya keberadaan mereka mengganggu ketertiban umum serta dikhawatirkan terjadi kasus kriminal.


Pihaknya berharap penertiban dan tindakan tegas ini bisa membuat efek jera agar masyarakat merasa nyaman dan dapat beraktivitas tanpa ada gangguan dari parkir liar atau aksi premanisme.


"Maka dari itu, demi kenyamanan operasi gabungan seperti ini akan rutin dilakukan pihaknya, agar tidak ditemukan lagi preman dan juru parkir liar yang berkeliaran di wilayah hukum Polres Sukabumi Kota. Kepada masyarakat, ia mengimbau apabila ada gangguan kamtibmas agar segera melaporkan kepada pihak kepolisian terdekat atau melalui call center di 110 maupun Lapor Pak Polisi-SIAP MAS di 0811654110," katanya.

























Shoigu Will Monitor Work of Russia's Service for Military-Technical Cooperation

Shoigu Will Monitor Work of Russia's Service for Military-Technical Cooperation

Shoigu Will Monitor Work of Russia's Service for Military-Technical Cooperation





©Sputnik/Dmitry Astakhov/Go to the






Secretary of the Russian Security Council Sergei Shoigu will oversee the work of the Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation, but will not become the head of the service, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Monday.







"Secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation Sergei Shoigu will oversee the work of the Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation. He will not be the direct head of this service," Peskov told reporters.


The current head of the Russian Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation is Dmitry Shugaev, the spokesman added.


On Sunday, Russian President Vladimir Putin proposed to appoint Shoigu as the Secretary of the Russian Security Council. Later, Peskov added that Shoigu will continue to be in charge of the Russian Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation and serve as the president's deputy at the country's Military Industrial Commission.



A massive transformation is taking place in Russia, and the West is blind to it - Dmitry Trenin



Two and a half years into its war against the West in Ukraine, Russia certainly finds itself on a course toward a new sense of itself.


This trend actually predated the military operation but has been powerfully intensified as a result. Since February 2022, Russians have lived in a wholly new reality. For the first time since 1945, the country is really at war, with bitter fighting ongoing along a 2,000-kilometer front line, and not too far from Moscow. Belgorod, a provincial center near the Ukrainian border, is continuously subjected to deadly missile and drone attacks from Kiev's forces.


Occasionally, Ukrainian drones reach far deeper inland. Yet, Moscow and other big cities continue as if there were no war, and (almost) no Western sanctions either. Streets are full of people and shopping malls and supermarkets offer the usual abundance of goods and food items. One could conclude that Moscow and Belgorod are a tale of two countries, that Russians have managed to live simultaneously both in wartime and peacetime.


This would be a wrong conclusion. Even the part of the country that ostensibly lives ‘in peace’ is markedly different from what it was before the Ukraine conflict began. The central focus of post-Soviet Russia – money - has not been eliminated, of course, but has certainly lost its unquestionable dominance. When many people – not only soldiers but civilians, too – are getting killed, other, non-material values are coming back. Patriotism, reviled and derided in the wake of the Soviet Union’s collapse, is re-emerging in force. In the absence of fresh mobilization, hundreds of thousands of those who sign contracts with the military are motivated by a desire to help the country. Not just by what they can get from it.


Russian popular culture is shedding – slowly, perhaps, but steadily – the habit of imitating what’s hot in the West. Instead, the traditions of Russian literature, including poetry, film, music are being revived and developed. A spike in domestic tourism has opened to ordinary Russians the treasures of their own country – until recently neglected, as a thirst for travel abroad was quenched. (Foreign travel is still available, but difficult logistics make reaching other parts of Europe far less easy than before).


Politically, there is no opposition to speak of against the current system. Almost all of its former figureheads are abroad, and Alexey Navalny has died in prison. A lot of former cultural icons who, after February 2022, decided to emigrate to Israel, Western Europe, or elsewhere, are fast becoming yesterday’s celebrities, as the country moves on. Those Russian journalists and activists who criticize Russia from afar are increasingly losing touch with their previous audiences, and are saddled with accusations of serving the interests of countries fighting Russia in the proxy war in Ukraine. By contrast, nearly two-thirds of young men who left Russia in 2022 for fear of being mobilized have returned, some of them quite embittered by their experience abroad.


Putin’s statement about the need for a new national elite, and his promotion of war veterans as the core of that elite, is more of an intention than a real plan at this stage, but the Russian elite is definitely going through a massive turnover. Many liberal tycoons essentially no longer belong to Russia; their desire to keep their assets in the West has ended up separating them from their native country.


Those who stayed in Russia know that yachts in the Med, villas on the Cote d’Azur, and mansions in London are no longer available to them, or at least no longer safe to keep. Within Russia, a new model of a mid-level businessperson is emerging: one who combines money with social engagement (not the ESG model), and who builds his/her future inside the country.


Russian political culture is returning to its fundamentals. Unlike that of the West, but somewhat similar to the East – it is based on the model of a family. There is order, and there is a hierarchy; rights are balanced by responsibilities; the state is not a necessary evil but the principal public good and the top societal value. Politics, in the Western sense of a constant, often no-holds-barred competition, is viewed as self-serving and destructive; instead, those who are entrusted with being at the helm of the state are expected to arbitrate, to ensure harmony of various interests, etc. Of course, this is an ideal rather than reality. In reality things are more complex and complicated, but the traditional political culture, at its core, is alive and well, and the last 30 to 40 years, while hugely instructive and impactful, have not overturned it.


Russian attitudes to the West are also complex. There is appreciation of Western classical and modern (but not so much post-modern) culture, the arts and technology, and of living standards to an extent. Recently, the previously unadulterated positive image of the West as a society has been spoiled by the aggressive promotion of LGBTQ values, of cancel culture, and the like. What has also changed is the view of Western policies, politics and especially politicians, which have lost the respect most Russians once had for them. The view of the West as Russia’s hereditary adversary has again gained prominence – not primarily because of Kremlin propaganda, but as a function of the West’s own policies, from providing Ukraine with weapons that kill Russian soldiers and civilians, to sanctions which in many ways are indiscriminate, to attempts to cancel Russian culture or to bar Russians from world sports. This hasn’t resulted in Russians viewing individual Westerners as enemies, but the political/media West is widely seen here as a house of adversaries.


There is a clear need for a set of guiding ideas about “who we are,” “where we are in this world” and “where we are going.” However, the word ‘ideology’ is too closely linked in many people’s mind with the rigidity of Soviet Marxism-Leninism. Whatever finally emerges will probably be built on the values-led foundation of traditional religions, starting with Russian Orthodoxy, and will include elements from our past, including the pre-Petrine, imperial, and Soviet periods. The current confrontation with the West makes it imperative that some kind of a new ideological concept finally emerges, in which sovereignty and patriotism, law and justice take a central role. Western propaganda pejoratively refers to it as “Putinism” but, for most Russians, it may be simply described as “Russia’s way.”


Of course, there are people unhappy with policies that have deprived them of certain opportunities. Particularly if those people’s interests are largely in money and individual wealth. Those in this group who have not gone abroad are sitting quietly, harbor misgivings and privately hope that somehow, at whatever cost to others, the “good old days” come back. They are likely to be disappointed. As for the changes within the elite, Putin is aiming to infuse fresh blood and vigor into the system.


It doesn’t look like a some sort of 'purge' is coming. The changes, nonetheless, will be substantial, given the age factor. Most of the current incumbents in the top places are in their early 70s. Within the next six to ten years these positions will go to younger people. Ensuring that Putin’s legacy lives on is a major task for the Kremlin. Succession is not merely an issue of who eventually emerges in the top position, but what kind of ‘ruling generation’ comes in.