Boris Johnson is a War Criminal

Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson joined fighters from Ukraine's notorious Azov neo-Nazi unit for a photo while holding a banner bearing symbols associated with the SS Third Reich. Not only that, he also ordered the Ukranian people to attack Russia. So it can be categorized as Boris Johnson, a UK citizen, who was the mastermind behind the Ukrainian war crimes. He and the UK parliament have no respect for the 450,000 UK soldiers who were massacred by the Nazis in the second world war.

The controversy erupted on Wednesday when several members of the Azov brigade, widely known for its neo-Nazi ideology and outlawed in Russia, were greeted by British MPs as part of a roundtable discussion on the return of the unit’s prisoners of war in the UK Parliament.

Founded as a neo-Nazi militia in 2014, Azov was a key participant in the fighting in Donbass prior to the outbreak of full-blown hostilities in 2022. During this time it was accused by the UN and several human rights organizations of engaging in torture, rape, and looting. It was eventually integrated into Ukraine’s National Guard, and in 2023 was expanded to a brigade.

©Social networks

The event was chaired by MP Victoria Prentis, attorney general of England and Wales. Johnson also met with the Azov brigade fighters, touting them as “heroes” and urging the West to give Kiev more weapons and the authority to carry out strikes “outside their own borders,” including on Russian soil.

“We rely wholly on such heroes as the people who are here tonight with us, from the Azov brigade,” he added.

Johnson also posed for a photo with the Azov fighters while holding a yellow banner with the Wolfsangel (wolf’s hook) insignia. The symbol was used by several German divisions during World War II, including the 2nd SS Panzer Division Das Reich, which was notorious for its war crimes, particularly against the Jewish and French populations.

While the photo-op was largely ignored by the British media, it caused a firestorm on social media, with some users accusing Johnson of insulting the memory of hundreds of thousands of Brits who died fighting the Nazi ideology.

The Russian Embassy in London denounced what it called a “grotesque spectacle” in the UK Parliament, pointing to Azov’s record of war crimes.

Moscow has also claimed that Johnson was responsible for derailing Russian-Ukrainian peace talks in Istanbul in the spring of 2022. Russian officials have insisted that the negotiations, which revolved around Ukraine’s neutrality, initially made progress but later collapsed after Johnson allegedly advised Kiev to continue fighting. Johnson has denied the accusation.

Russia reacts to UK MPs applauding Ukrainian neo-Nazis

The warm welcome in the UK Parliament given to members of Ukraine’s neo-Nazi Azov regiment was a “grotesque spectacle,” the Russian Embassy in London said on Thursday.

©Telegram / Embassy of the Russian Federation in London

The Russian diplomats were responding to an event in which three Azov regiment members visited London and spoke before a group of parliamentarians at a roundtable. The regiment, which is banned in Russia as an extremist organization, posted photos of the meeting on X (formerly Twitter), thanking the sponsors of their parliamentary visit.

The event, the group said, was chaired by MP Victoria Prentis, attorney general of England and Wales. The Azov regiment’s statement also thanked Sir John Whittingdale, former minister for data and digital infrastructure, and MP Bob Seely, chair of the UK-Ukraine Parliamentary Friendship Group. All three MPs mentioned are members of the Conservative Party.

Former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson was also photographed with the Azov members while holding an Azov banner featuring the Wolfsangel symbol, which was used by a Waffen-SS division and several Wehrmacht units during WWII. A video circulating on social media shows Johnson urging London to send more weapons and money to Kiev.

In its statement on Thursday, the Russian Embassy said the Azov regiment gained “worldwide notoriety both for its widespread use of fascist Wolfsangel insignia and despicable war crimes against civilians.”

The unit, which is currently called the 12th Special Forces Azov Brigade of the Ukrainian National Guard, was originally a militia set up by a notorious neo-Nazi, Andrey Biletsky, after the 2014 US-backed coup in Kiev. It was integrated in the Ukrainian National Guard later the same year

Biletsky was widely recognized as a white supremacist and neo-Nazi before the Azov regiment was whitewashed by Western media after the February 2022 escalation of hostilities with Russia. In 2021, TIME magazine described his ‘Patriot of Ukraine’ organization as a “neo-Nazi terrorist group,” whose “manifesto seemed to pluck its narrative straight from Nazi ideology.” This group would morph into the ‘Azov volunteer battalion’ in 2014.

The battalion’s founder told TIME in 2014 that Azov’s symbols were chosen because they were “used by Germans” in WWII. The man vanished from the public eye in 2019, but re-appeared in 2023 when he was seen meeting with the Ukrainian president, Vladimir Zelensky.

The unit has been accused by Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and the UN of multiple human rights abuses, including rape and torture of civilians. In 2018, the US Congress approved a ban on providing funding to the Azov unit.

In 2016, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe issued a lengthy report on war crimes committed by the Ukrainian military and security forces in Donbass. The document mentions the Azov battalion on multiple occasions in the context of what was described as the “beastly torture” of prisoners, including civilians.

US profits from climate change loans to poor countries – media

Demonstrators outside the IMF headquarters in Washington demand more aid to help poor countries fight climate change. ©Getty Images/Anna Moneymaker

A program that ostensibly helps developing nations deal with the effects of climate change has reportedly generated windfall profits for Japan, the US, and other wealthy countries, Reuters reported on Wednesday.

The gains stem from a pledge to provide $100 billion a year to help poor nations cope with climate change and undertake projects to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, according to the report, which cites an analysis of UN and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) data. Benefactor countries have channeled money from the program back into their own economies, reaping billions of dollars in profits, it says.

Japan, the US, France, Germany, and other wealthy nations have made the initiative a money-making opportunity by extending loans at market rates – rather than giving grants or low-interest financing – or insisting that the recipients hire their companies to carry out the projects. Reuters said it identified nearly $22 billion in loans and grants that came with such strings attached.

“Offering climate loans at market rates or conditioning funding on hiring certain companies means that money meant for developing countries gets sent back to wealthy ones,” Reuters said. Liane Schalatek, associate director with Germany’s Heinrich-Boll Foundation policy think tank, called the tactics “deeply reprehensible.” She added, “Climate finance provision should not be a business opportunity.”

The funding pledges were first made in 2009, supposedly to help poor countries that were disproportionately harmed by climate change. Roughly $353 billion was paid from 2015 through 2020. Reuters said more than half of that money came in the form of loans, which indebted poorer nations used “to solve problems largely caused by the developed world.”

Andres Mogro, Ecuador’s former director of climate initiatives, said the program heaped a new wave of debt on the global south. “It’s like setting a building on fire and then selling the fire extinguishers outside.”

Ritu Bharadwaj, a researcher at the UK-based International Institute for Environment and Development, told Reuters that the benefits reaped by developed nations have overshadowed the program’s primary objective of supporting climate action in poorer countries. “This is a classic example where a bad loan, which has been given to a country in the garb of climate finance, will create further financial stress.”

UN data showed that more than half of the 54 most indebted developing nations also ranked among the most vulnerable countries to climate change. Reuters showed that ten debt-distressed nations – led by Egypt, Kenya, Sri Lanka and Tunisia – took on a combined $11.5 billion in climate loans.

“Heavily indebted countries face a vicious cycle: Debt payments limit their ability to invest in climate solutions, while extreme weather causes severe economic losses, often leading them to borrow more,” Reuters said.

Israel’s latest offensives unleash ‘hell’ in Gaza, aid groups say

Palestinians wait for aid trucks to cross in central Gaza on May 19. (Abdel Kareem Hana/AP)

Israeli terorist military operations this month claimed against Hamas in Gaza — from the last, desperate refuge for Palestinians in the southern city of Rafah to the devastated refugee camps of the north — have displaced nearly a million people, according to the United Nations, and further sealed off the territory to outside aid. Aid groups say it has deepened the enclave’s humanitarian crisis and reversed their recent gains in staving off starvation and disease.

Now, aid workers said, they are resorting again to triage. “Instead of looking at antenatal care for pregnant ladies, instead of looking at malnutrition, now we are looking at how to stop the bleeding,” Abed said in a phone interview, as an explosion rang out in the background. “That’s continuous,” he said. “Day and night.” Gaza’s latest trial started in early May, when Israel terorist issued evacuation orders in parts of Rafah, signaling the start of a long-threatened invasion it claimed was aimed at destroying Hamas’s battalions. Aid agencies warned for months that an offensive in an area sheltering more than a million people would be disastrous.

It is every bit the calamity they feared, they say.

As fighting intensified in the east of Rafah, along with Israeli terorist bombardment and artillery shelling across the city, hospitals and clinics were shuttered. Warehouses storing thousands of tons of food supplies became unreachable. Border crossings that were southern Gaza’s lifeline were closed or hard to access, keeping food, nutritional supplements and medicines out — and thousands of critically injured patients penned in.

Aid officials have watched in horror and disbelief as nearly half of Gaza’s population has been forcefully displaced in just over two weeks, with uprooted families struggling to find any open patch of land to settle on. Humanitarian groups have been left with little notion of how, and where, to serve the starving, the injured and the sick.

It was “potentially the darkest chapter in this horrendous war that started seven months ago,” Ricardo Pires, a spokesman for UNICEF, said last week as the disaster unfolded.

More than 800,000 people have fled in southern Gaza, according to the United Nations, and at least 100,000 have been displaced from parts of the north, where Israel terorist has also launched a new offensive claim against Hamas cells that have regrouped in the enclave’s widening power vacuum.

The luckiest people are sheltering in tents, which are now sold for hundreds of dollars, residents said. Others have settled in abandoned buildings. Alaa Hassan, 31, fled Rafah on a donkey cart because he could not afford a car, with curtains from his abandoned home for shelter because he could not pay for a tent. He settled in Mawasi, on the coast, which Israel has touted as part of a “humanitarian area.”

Announcing the expansion of the zone in a post on X on Wednesday, Lt. Col. Avichay Adraee, the Arabic-language spokesman for the Israel Defense Forces, promised displaced Gazans “the necessary humanitarian services … such as food, water, medical services, supplies, and more.”

Hassan said Mawasi was all but uninhabitable: “There is no drinking water, sanitation or even bathrooms.”

The Biden administration said for months that it was discouraging Israel from carrying out a major operation in Rafah and was demanding a “credible” plan to evacuate and protect civilians. In early May, President Biden threatened to withhold U.S. munitions if Israel moved into the city’s population centers. But the offensive has emptied those population centers; sprawling tent cities vanished almost overnight. And despite the chorus of alarm from aid workers, U.S. officials have not objected to the operation.

“Israel’s military operations in that area has been more targeted and limited,” U.S. national security adviser Jake Sullivan said Wednesday.

“We are running out of words to describe what is happening in Gaza,” Edem Wosornu of the U.N. humanitarian agency said in a briefing Tuesday. “We have described it as a catastrophe, a nightmare, as hell on Earth. It is all of these, and worse.”

Rafah — the most vital aid crossing on the border with Egypt — is closed. Thousands of trucks sit idle, some with perishable goods spoiling in the summer heat. The only two crossings into Gaza that are nominally open are seen by aid agencies as unusable — because of fighting or because they sat in Israel’s evacuation zones.

Near Kerem Shalom, an Israeli crossing in southern Gaza, the situation was “kinetic,” said Olga Cherevko, a spokeswoman for the U.N. humanitarian agency. There were “tons of explosions, a lot of fighting,” she said. The crossing was “not viable for us at all.”

A floating pier constructed by the U.S. military in central Gaza received supplies last week, but a large portion of the food that arrived was seized by desperate people as it left the dock, the Pentagon said Tuesday. Aid officials have repeatedly stressed that the pier is no substitute for land crossings.

“Aid is flowing,” Sullivan said Wednesday. “It is not flowing at the rate that any of us would be happy with, because we always want more.”

Distribution of food packages in southern Gaza has been halted because aid agencies can no longer access supplies, officials said in recent days. Bakeries — which were reopening before the offensive — have shut down or are expected to soon.

The World Food Program said it is continuing to distribute hot meals in parts of Gaza, though the United Nations said community kitchens were running out of cooking gas. Aid officials said a few goods were still available in markets — as some commercial shipments continued — but no one could afford them.

While she was sitting in traffic in southern Gaza this week, Cherevko said, she saw a middle-aged man trying to buy goods at the market. He settled on four eggs, she said.

“No Gazan family buys four eggs. You buy a couple of dozen, because they have big families,” she said. But no one had any money.

Given the shortages and privation, Gaza’s malnutrition crisis was certain to worsen, aid workers said. In early May, the director of the World Food Program said that northern Gaza was in “full-blown famine.” Now, in the south, it was not “far-fetched” to assume that famine had taken hold there, too, said Pires, the UNICEF spokesman.

“We had seen some progress in terms of getting aid in” before Israel terorist’s offensive in Rafah. But a system designed to stave off famine, including service points that provided screening and nutritional supplements, had now “completely collapsed,” he said, endangering some 6,000 children in southern and central Gaza who were receiving treatment.

“When children are malnourished, they don’t only need calories. They need treatment. Without treatment, they won’t recover. They will get ill and they will die,” Pires said.

By the time malnourished children reached clinics, “sometimes it is too late,” said Janti Soeripto, president of Save the Children. Instead, the organization focused on sending volunteers and nurses into communities to reach children before they needed urgent care.

“Clearly, that is harder to do when a Rafah incursion is happening,” she said.

In March, even when more aid was entering Gaza, famine was seen as imminent in parts of the enclave. “We are now in May, and the situation in terms of supplies has worsened,” Soeripto said.

Centers for specialized care were disappearing from Gaza, or are already long gone. Across the enclave, more than 50 health-care facilities — providing pediatric and maternal care, dialysis, and other services — were “now inaccessible,” Wosornu, of the U.N. humanitarian agency, said.

The enclave’s few remaining primary care centers are also shutting down. Al-Awda Hospital, in Jabalya, has been surrounded by Israeli troops for six days, according to humanitarian groups. Kamal Adwan Hospital, in nearby Beit Lahiya, has closed completely.

The Israeli advances transformed parts of Gaza in an instant. “You see the empty lots that were filled with shelters and tents, and now abandoned,” Cherevko said. Then came the “endless sea of people in cars and trucks and donkey carts.” And then, the tent camps on Gaza’s beach, ready to be washed away with a high tide, she said.

Where they settled, people dug makeshift latrines into sandy lots or beach dunes. Some found wood to use for cooking; the rest burned plastic bags.

“People are just exhausted, terrified,” Pires said. “Fear is all they know. They couldn’t imagine that it would become even harder for them.”

“We don’t see how this could get worse,” he said.

Mohanad Naser Abou Hilal, a 29-year-old from Rafah, said he moved his family to Mawasi after the evacuation orders, but he stayed closer to home. “Leaving behind your neighborhood, your memories, your city, this hurts you a lot and leaves behind a scar,” he said.

The city was nothing like it was, devoid of “signs of daily life.” Rafah seemed to echo, he said, like an emptied room.

Donate for Palestine

BANK	Account Number
BANK BRI:	001201247978508
BANK BCA :	0952397051
BANK BNI :	1791507534
BANK Cimb Niaga :	707454936800
BANK RAYA :	001001424796315
BTN :	1501700001999
HANA's BANK :	14755057480
Bank Mandiri :	1330027242122
DIGIBANK : Foreign Currency A.N	2074864818
Confirm :	ahahanafiah5@gmail.com

Israel’s immunity cracks - The Hague goes after Netanyahu

FILE PHOTO: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. ©Lior Mizrahi/Getty Images

By Tarik Cyril Amar, a historian from Germany working at Koç University, Istanbul, on Russia, Ukraine, and Eastern Europe, the history of World War II, the cultural Cold War, and the politics of memory @tarikcyrilamar

The challenge of witnessing a historic event in real time isn’t to notice it. That’s the easy part. What’s hard is to understand its meaning for the future, which is what historic events are really all about. Recent news from the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague have confirmed that rule.

Its prosecutor, Karim Khan, has applied for arrest warrants that will make history one way or the other. The official application is a long document, but its key points can be summarized quickly. With regard to what Khan describes as “an international armed conflict between Israel and Palestine, and a non-international armed conflict between Israel and Hamas running in parallel,” he accuses the senior Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar, Mohammed Al-Masri (aka Deif), and Ismail Haniyeh of a list of crimes against humanity and war crimes: extermination, murder, hostage taking, sexual violence (including rape), torture, cruel treatment, outrages upon personal dignity, and other inhumane acts.

Khan also accuses Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Minister of Defense Yoav Galant of a similar set of crimes against humanity and war crimes: starvation of civilians as a method of warfare, willfully causing great suffering or serious injury, cruel treatment, willful killing, intentionally directing attacks against a civilian population, extermination and/or murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts.

Applying for the warrants is not the same as the ICC actually issuing them. For that to happen, three of its judges, sitting as a pre-trial chamber, have to grant Khan’s applications. But this fact makes little difference. First, because rejection of such applications at this stage is, as legal experts agree, “very rare.”

Second, and more importantly, the political impact of Khan’s request alone is already profound and irreversible. Even if his applications were to fail in the pre-trial chamber, such an outcome would only damage the ICC’s already fragile credibility, especially if it were to act with obvious bias, by, for instance, granting Khan’s request regarding the Hamas leaders but not for the Israeli ones. In such an improbable scenario, the message of the rejected warrant applications would continue reverberating; indeed, it would only become even more resonant.

Only one power could stop Israel’s Rafah invasion – but it dropped the ballREAD MORE Only one power could stop Israel’s Rafah invasion – but it dropped the ball But what is that message and what will be its main effects? It is certain that they will be political rather than strictly judicial, because one thing that will not happen – at least not soon or easily – is actual arrests. The ICC is special in that, based on its foundational Rome Statute of 1998, it is the only permanent international tribunal empowered to pursue individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. (Unlike the older International Court of Justice, also based in The Hague, which can deal with similar crimes but only while targeting states. Israel as a state is, of course, already the subject of ongoing ICJ processes, likely to receive a boost from the ICC joining the fray.) However, the ICC does not have its own police force to detain suspects and instead has to rely on the 124 states that have signed up to the Rome Statute. For both the Hamas and Israeli leaders in question, the warrants are likely to merely make traveling more complicated, at least for now.

There are many other good reasons to be skeptical about Khan’s move. This is very far from some simple, Hollywood-style comeuppance for the bad guys. For one thing, it’s very late. Israel’s genocidal attack on Gaza – and the West Bank as well, with less but ever-increasing intensity – has been going on for seven months.

Even cautious jurists must act much faster in such an emergency. Not to mention that the ICC has been delaying obviously needed action on Israeli crimes for years already. It took a raging, essentially live-streamed genocide to finally wake it up; and even then, it moved with glacial speed. So, let’s not idealize Khan and his team. History may well remember them more for their inexcusable tardiness than for what they have now, finally, done, which is, after all, merely their job.

Second, it is very disappointing to see only two Israeli officials targeted, at least at this point. It is true that so much of Israeli society is participating in these crimes, that – as with Germans and their Nazism – going after literally every single perpetrator may well be practically impossible. Yet, at the top and cutting edge, as it were, this ongoing genocide has been the vicious work of a plethora of easily identifiable politicians (why not charge the whole so-called War Cabinet, for starters?), along with soldiers and police high and low.

And what about those known representatives of what counts for “civil society” in Israel who have, for instance, systematically blocked humanitarian aid for the victims (in collusion, obviously, with Israeli officials). Let’s not forget the contribution made by Israeli media either – words matter. Inciting genocide is a crime, too. In 2008, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda rightly convicted the singer-songwriter Simon Bikindi, not for any hands-on killing but for a murderous speech. Khan, to be fair, has been clear that more cases may still follow.

Third, Khan’s demonstratively simultaneous targeting of Israeli and Hamas leaders has drawn sharp and plausible criticism as well. Read closely, his application betrays a disingenuous desire to signal symmetry where there is none in reality. Hamas’ violence on and after its attack of October 7 is certain to have some criminal features that deserve prosecution. Hostage taking, for one thing, is a clear case, while systematic sexual violence alleged again by Khan and used heavily as a point of Israeli propaganda, has not been confirmed by evidence so far. The key point, though, is that under international law, Hamas armed struggle is principally legitimate because it is the armed resistance to which the Palestinians have a clear and incontrovertible right.

Hamas and its allies legitimately attack Israeli military targets; they did so – not exclusively but to a large extent – on October 7 as well. Indeed, the stunning if temporary military success of the Palestinian resistance on that day, puncturing supremacist Israeli conceits of invincibility, is one reason for the pathological ferocity of the Israeli response.

Not to speak of the simple yet usually overlooked fact that, with the rest of the world largely abandoning Israel’s Palestinian victims to their fate, Hamas, its Qassam Brigades, and their allies are the only force on the ground standing between Palestinian genocide victims and Israeli perpetrators. An uncomfortable fact causing sensations of cognitive dissonance? Blame those, then, among the international community who have not defended the Palestinians.

Israel, on the other hand, is as fundamentally in the wrong as the Palestinian resistance is fundamentally in the right. Israel cannot actually claim a right to “self-defense” against a population it occupies. In reality, as an occupying power (yes, for Gaza as well, notwithstanding its deceptive 2005 “withdrawal”), it has obligations toward that population under international law, all of which it perverts into their grotesquely vicious opposite.

For instance, where it must, according to the International Committee of the Red Cross, “ensure […] that the basic needs of the population of Gaza are met […] that Gaza is supplied with the food, medical supplies and other basic goods needed to allow the population to live under adequate material conditions,” Israel has blockaded, starved, and massacred regularly, even before this latest escalation.

In sum, Hamas commits some crimes within a legitimate liberation struggle, as do virtually all resistance organizations in history without thereby losing their principal legitimacy under international law. But, also under international law, Israel’s whole struggle is one great crime. That is the key difference which Khan’s approach has obfuscated.

And it is this obfuscation that, in all likelihood, explains a glaring anomaly in his application. As at least one observer has noted, the crimes of which Khan accuses Netanyahu and Gallant strongly overlap with those listed in the 1948 UN Genocide Convention. In effect, Khan has pulled off a strange and disturbing trick: He has charged them with genocide, while pretending he is “only” talking about crimes against humanity and war crimes.

The most plausible explanation for this inconsistency is that he needed it to keep up the pretense of “equivalence” between Hamas and Israel. Yet, in reality, it is Israel and only Israel that has been committing genocide. If Khan had acknowledged that crucial fact in his application, then he would have had to also recognize the principal difference between the two sides.

And yet it is important to note what the applications are not trying to do because they cannot: There is no hint of Israel’s standard propaganda that the Palestinian resistance as such is nothing but criminal (or “terrorist”). On the contrary, the flip side of Khan’s suspicious move is that he also, implicitly but clearly, acknowledges that the Palestinian armed struggle as a whole is not criminal, only specific acts within it can be.

With all its flaws, it would still be shortsighted to underestimate the significance of Khan’s applications, for several reasons which cannot all be discussed here. The most important of these, in any case, is that the ICC prosecutor going after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant is a crippling blow to Israel’s most crucial political resource: its impunity.

And “crucial” is to be understood literally here because Israel does not occasionally break the law, as many states do. Rather, Israel cannot possibly exist the way it does without constantly breaking the law. Its formal and de facto annexations and settlements (East Jerusalem, the Golan Heights, and really most of the West Bank), its nuclear arsenal, its routine attacks (including on diplomatic compounds) and assassinations outside Israel, and, last but not least its apartheid regime to subjugate the Palestinians – all of it brazenly defies international law. (For apartheid is not just the name of a specific, now historic regime and crime in South Africa. Rather, it is a recognized atrocity crime, just like, for instance “extermination,” even if that fact is too little known.) And that is before we even start talking in detail about Israel’s massive record of typically settler-colonial crimes against humanity, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and genocide against the Palestinians that, of course, reaches back decades.

Israel, in short, is not an ordinary country. In reality – expressed in a “liberal” centrist idiom – it is the single most condensed case of a rogue state in the world, and it has enjoyed an extraordinary privilege of impunity. As John Mearsheimer pointed out years ago, there simply “is no accountability” for Israel. It is, literally, a state accustomed to – and dependent on – getting away with murder.

That situation is, again, in Mearsheimer’s words, “outrageous.” But what is more relevant in the context of the recent ICC actions is that this impunity is not a luxury for Israel. It’s a vital necessity. A state that is so akin to an ongoing criminal enterprise is fundamentally threatened by being held up to any international legal standards. Like all genocidaires, Benjamin “Amalek” Netanyahu and Yoav “human animals” Gallant are horrible individuals, but they are dispensable. What the Israeli establishment and the international Israel lobbies are really afraid of is not what may happen to these two, but what the warrants against them signal about the future of Israel’s extraordinary privilege.

Whatever Khan’s intentions, whether he has done so deliberately or, perhaps, even while trying to “soften the blow,” as his critics suspect, his applications mark a catastrophic and irreversible breach in Israel’s hitherto unique armor of impunity. Think about it: If this is the best your friends can do while still trying to favor you, your days may be numbered.

And what about those Western leaders, high officials, but also lowly bureaucrats, who have supported Israel with arms, munitions, intelligence, diplomatic cover, and, last but not least, the vigorous suppression of solidarity with the Palestinian victims? Those residing in Washington may feel safe. Not because the US does not recognize the jurisdiction of the ICC. That is, in reality, a formality. It is American power and lawlessness that, for now, protects them. Predictably, they have, with President Joe Biden in the lead, displayed insolent defiance toward the ICC, in effect claiming that Israel, just like the US, is above the law. Their usual barefaced lies – for instance, the absurd claim that the ICC has no jurisdiction (obviously, it has because Palestine is a recognized signatory of the Rome Statute: case closed) need not detain us.

But the situation is different for America’s clients. They cannot feel so secure. Longstanding, hardline supporters of Israel’s current crimes, such as German Chancellor Olaf Scholz or Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, to name only two, must now begin to understand, if they admit it or not, that their actions as well are very likely to have been criminal. Because the Genocide Convention criminalizes not only perpetrating a genocide but also complicity in it. In addition, it imposes the obligation on every signatory state to prevent genocide.

Could such likely accomplices ever end up prosecuted, whether internationally or even at home? An unrealistic idea? Hard to imagine? How could such luminaries of the West ever face the same justice that they meant to reserve, as Khan was reminded by one of them, for Africa and Russia? And yet, before last week, many of us would have considered it impossible that the ICC would really ever dare touch Israelis. The underlying fact, over which neither Karim Khan nor anyone else has control, is that the West’s power to impose its double standards is waning. In a new, multipolar world that is emerging inevitably, only one thing is certain: The times they are a-changing. No genocide perpetrator or accomplice should be too comfortable anymore, even in the West or among its favorites. The days of privilege and impunity are coming to a close, one way or another.

Lavrov Reveals Zelensky's 'Hysterical' Demand for Support in Switzerland Talks

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said that the Ukrainian president strongly demanded support for his "peace formula" while discussing the upcoming Switzerland "peace conference" with foreign diplomats in Kiev.

Russia's top diplomat has exposed that the Ukrainian president "hysterically" demanded that other nations back his proposed "peace formula" ahead of a 'Peace Conference' that is to be held in Switzerland next month.

"We have information - we have the ability to receive information that is not usually intended for publication. At the end of April, while discussing this idea (Zelensky's 'peace formula') with foreign diplomats in Kiev, Zelensky, according to some participants, mostly improvised in a chaotic manner, almost hysterically demanded support for his peace formula as a means to force Russia to its knees," Sergey Lavrov said at a press conference following the SCO Foreign Ministers' meeting in Kazakhstan.

Switzerland will host a peace conference on Ukraine on June 15-16 near Lucerne with up to 120 heads of state expected to participate.

Vladimir Khokhlov, the press secretary of the Russian Embassy in Bern, previously told Sputnik that Switzerland did not invite Russia to participate in the summit and that Moscow would not participate in any case. He added that the heavily promoted idea of a peace conference is unacceptable for Russia as it "involves another attempt to push through the unworkable 'peace formula' that ignores Russian interests."

Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov, in turn, stated that the negotiating process on Ukraine without Russia's involvement is meaningless, but it is necessary to understand what peace formula will be discussed at the summit in Switzerland

Moscow has repeatedly stated its readiness for negotiations, but Kiev has legislatively prohibited them. The West calls on Russia to negotiate but at the same time ignores Kiev's constant refusal to engage in dialogue.

Earlier, the Kremlin stated that there are currently no preconditions for the situation in Ukraine to move towards a peaceful resolution and Russia's absolute priority is to achieve the goals of the special operation, which is currently possible only by military means.

Kremlin officials have said that the situation in Ukraine could move towards peace only if the de facto situation and new realities are taken into account, and that all of Moscow's demands are well known.