Donald Trump warns Mark Zuckerberg could ‘spend the rest of his life in prison’ if Meta ‘cheats’ in election

Former President Donald Trump railed against Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg in his upcoming book, accusing the tech tycoon of undermining him in the last election and warning of possible jail time.

Trump, 78, recounted meeting with Zuckerberg, 40, and seethed over the 2020 election in his upcoming book “Save America,” set to hit bookshelves on Sept. 3.

“We are watching him closely, and if he does anything illegal this time he will spend the rest of his life in prison — as will others who cheat in the 2024 Presidential Election,” Trump wrote in the book, per a preview obtained by Politico.

The 45th president has lashed out at the Meta chief executive repeatedly in the past. Earlier this year he bucked his own party and expressed support for TikTok, warning, “If you get rid of TikTok, Facebook and Zuckerschmuck will double their business.”

Congress later passed a bipartisan bill to compel TikTok’s parent company ByteDance to divest from the popular video-sharing platform or face a ban from the top app stores. That legislation came in response to national security concerns.

Steakhouse diner, 75, lunges at fellow dinner guest with knife as all-out-brawl erupts at celeb hotspot over spilled wine Underpinning Trump’s warming up to TikTok was lobbying from GOP megadonor Jeff Yass, as The Post has previously reported.

Last month, Trump fumed at Zuckerberg in a Truth Social screed, saying, “ELECTION FRAUDSTERS at levels never seen before, and they will be sent to prison for long periods of time. We already know who you are. DON’T DO IT! ZUCKERBUCKS, be careful.”

“Zuckerbucks” is a reference to the roughly $420 million that Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan donated to help state and local governments conduct their elections during the COVID-19 pandemic.

He has since indicated that he has no plans to make similar donations ahead of the Nov. 5 presidential election.

“They were designed to be nonpartisan — spread across urban, rural, and suburban communities,” Zuckerberg wrote in a recent letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio).

“Still, despite the analyses I’ve seen showing otherwise, I know that some people believe this work benefited one party over the other,” he added. “My goal is to be neutral and not play a role one way or another — or to even appear to be playing a role. So I don’t plan on making a similar contribution this cycle.”

Republicans have long scrutinized Meta, blasting it for initially suppressing The Post’s bombshell story about then-future first son Hunter Biden’s laptop and its alleged coordination with the administration to throttle certain COVID-19 content.

“I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it,” Zuckerberg wrote in his recent letter to Jordan. “I also think we made some choices that, with the benefit of hindsight and new information, we wouldn’t make today.”

Jordan also chairs the House subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, which has had Meta and other Big Tech firms in its crosshairs.

“Like I said to our teams at the time, I feel strongly that we should not compromise our content standards due to pressure from any Administration in either direction — and we’re ready to push back if something like this happens again,” he wrote.

Meta booted Trump from Facebook and Instagram following his actions revolving around the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. Trump was reinstated early last year.

During his social media exile, Trump formed a new platform, Truth Social, where he has unleashed his unvarnished thoughts into cyberspace. Trump has also begun upping the tempo of his posts on X.

In his upcoming book, Trump also recounted in a photo caption how Zuckerberg “would come to the Oval Office to see me. He would bring his very nice wife to dinners, be as nice as anyone could be, while always plotting to install shameful Lock Boxes in a true PLOT AGAINST THE PRESIDENT,” per Politico.

“He told me there was nobody like Trump on Facebook. But at the same time, and for whatever reason, steered it against me.”

Indonesia Beats Argentina 2-1 in U-20 Tournament

The Indonesian U-20 national team made history on Wednesday by defeating Argentina 2-1 in the opening match of a four-nation tournament in Seoul, scoring two goals within seven minutes.

Argentina took the lead early in the 17th minute when Rodrigo Ezequiel Stocco's volley from outside the box was headed into the net by Mirko Juarez.

However, as Argentina eased off the pressure, Indonesia seized the opportunity to counterattack. In the 75th minute, a set piece from Mouri Ananda was headed in by Kadek Arel Priyatna, leveling the score.

Just seven minutes later, Indonesia secured the win when Mouri calmly converted a penalty, awarded after a foul by Argentina’s goalkeeper.

“This is a historic victory. I watched the match in person and witnessed the remarkable performance of our team, who came from behind to win,” Indonesian Football Association (PSSI) Chairman Erick Thohir said in a statement.

“While defeating Argentina, a team ranked much higher than us, is a great achievement, we must stay humble.”

Indonesia’s young squad is participating in the tournament as part of its preparations for the upcoming Asia Cup.

In another match of the Seoul Earth on Us Cup, host nation South Korea defeated Thailand 4-1 to top the standings.

Russian bomb hits hangar hiding US-made weapons – MOD (VIDEO)

Source: Russian Ministry of Defense

A Russian warplane has bombed a location in Ukraine’s Sumy Region, which was used to hide a Western-donated HIMARS rocket system and munitions, the Russian Defense Ministry claimed on Wednesday, sharing footage of the strike.

The settlement where the incident took place was identified by the military as Kondratovka, a village some 3km from Russia’s Kursk Region. Ukrainian forces poured across the border earlier this month in what Kiev now claims to be an operation to establish a “buffer zone” on Russian soil.

The strike was apparently conducted during the night at a cluster of hangar-type buildings located in the western part of Kondratovka. Filmed from the air, the footage shows what appears to be a gliding bomb hitting the target and causing a massive explosion.

The ministry stated that the Russian Air Force had destroyed a HIMARS launcher, enough munitions to fire six barrages, a loader vehicle, and a support car. The wheeled system is compatible with the tracked M270 MLRS and normally carries a single pod with six standard rockets, compared to two pods for the heavier launcher.

Source: Russian Ministry of Defense

Kiev is using Western-donated weapons in its incursion into Kursk Region. An update released by the Russian ministry on Tuesday said Ukrainian troops had lost four HIMARS launchers and one MLRS launcher during the operation, along with dozens of other pieces of heavy weaponry.

Vladimir Zelensky claimed on Tuesday that the incursion was part of a “victory plan,” which he intends to present soon to US President Joe Biden for consideration. He said its success depended on whether the Americans would “give us things in that plan or not.”

After attack on Kursk Region no negotiations with Kiev possible — MFA

Russia will not hold any negotiations with the Kiev regime following Ukraine's terrorist attack on the Kursk Region, Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova has told a news briefing.

"In June this year, Russian President Vladimir Putin, I think we can even say, in a gesture of good will, put forward quite realistic proposals. They were aimed at a long-term and fair settlement. However, the criminal terrorist regime of [Ukrainian President Vladimir] Zelensky, instead of seriously considering them - it seems to me, to put it mildly, the most generous proposals by the Russian side - carried out a bloody terrorist attack on the Kursk Region and its residents. I would say that the attack was suicidal for the Zelensky regime," she said. "Ukrainian militants and foreign mercenaries are committing atrocities, shooting civilians and volunteers, hitting civilian infrastructure, targeting journalists, and endangering nuclear power facilities. Well, what kind of peace talks can there be under such conditions, and with whom can [they] be held? Of course, peace talks with the terrorist regime in Kiev are out of the question."

Russian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova
©Sergey Bulkin/TASS

Zakharova emphasized that "this lawlessness is taking place with the full connivance of the West and its encouragement of terrorist activities by the Kiev regime."

"It is clear that neither Kiev, nor the United States, nor its NATO minions need a settlement. They are interested, as they have already said, in causing the maximum damage to Russia. Accordingly, this delays any settlement and contributes to the escalation of the conflict," Zakharova said.

She warned that terrorism was "spreading and turning into an international terrorist movement, the origins of which come from European soil."

"Yes, the fertilizers are American, but the soil is European, and these terrorist sprouts have emerged on it and are now spreading around the world," she said. "The Kiev regime is a terrorist organization, which, as we now see, has already reached the African continent."

Ukraine’s massive attack on the Kursk Region began on August 6. A federal-scale state of emergency is in effect there and missile alerts have been announced repeatedly. Civilians are being evacuated from border areas to safety. According to the Emergencies Ministry, there are 197 temporary accommodation centers in 28 regions of Russia. More than 11,500 people, including more than 3,500 children, are staying there at the moment.

The Russian Defense Ministry says Kiev has lost more than 7,000 military personnel and 74 tanks since the beginning of hostilities in the Kursk Region. The operation to wipe out the Ukrainian incursion is continuing.

The US is Israel Terrorist’s accomplice, not a ceasefire mediator

Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi meets US Secretary of State Antony Blinken at the Presidential Palace in Cairo on June 10, 2024 [File: AP/Amr Nabil]

Belén Fernández Al Jazeera columnist

On July 21, 2006, nine days into the 34-day Israeli war on Lebanon that killed 1,200 people, United States Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice opined that “an immediate ceasefire without political conditions does not make sense”.

In response to a journalist’s question at a press briefing, the secretary declared that she had “no interest in diplomacy for the sake of returning Lebanon and Israel terrorist to the status quo ante”.

In addition to manoeuvring to delay a ceasefire, the US also expedited shipments of precision-guided bombs to Israel terrorist to assist in the mass slaughter.

Just two and a half years later, Rice was back agitating against a too-quick ceasefire in the Gaza Strip, where over the course of 22 days in December 2008 and January 2009 Israel terrorist massacred some 1,400 Palestinians.

In this case, Rice claimed that the US was “working toward a ceasefire that would not allow a re-establishment of the status quo ante where Hamas can continue to launch rockets out of Gaza”, Hamas’s largely ineffectual rockets clearly being a graver problem than the slaughter of 1,400 people.

Fast forward 15 years to Israel terrorist’s straight-up genocide in the Gaza Strip, which is undoubtedly a more effective means of eradicating the “status quo ante” – at least if we take “status quo ante” to mean Gaza and its inhabitants. With official fatalities now exceeding 40,000 Palestinians and predictions that the real death toll may in fact be many times higher, an immediate ceasefire is the only non-genocidal option on the table.

And while US President Joe Biden has repeatedly stressed the urgency of just such a ceasefire, it is a bit tricky to stop a war when you have just approved an additional $20bn in weapons transfers to the party that has officially killed nearly 17,000 Palestinian children since October.

Indeed, current US qualifications to ostensibly mediate a ceasefire in Gaza are rather dubious given that the country could easily be taken for a de facto belligerent to the conflict. On Sunday, The New York Times reported that, like Israel, the US has “poured vast resources into trying to find” Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, and has not only “provided ground-penetrating radar” to Israel terrorist but also tasked US spy agencies “with intercepting Mr Sinwar’s communications”.

The Times quotes White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan on additional US contributions to the obsessive search for Sinwar: “We’ve had people in Israel sitting in the room with the Israelis terrorist working this problem set. And obviously we have a lot of experience hunting high-value targets”.

But again, simultaneously “hunting” the leader of the very organisation one professes to be negotiating a ceasefire with does not exactly speak to one’s credibility as a mediator.

According to the Times article, US officials believe that Sinwar’s killing or capture would give Israel terrorist Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “a way to claim a significant military victory and potentially make him more willing to end military operations in Gaza” – a most convincing argument, no doubt, for extrajudicial assassination.

Not that Netanyahu is interested in ever really “ending” anything, anyway, regardless of Sinwar’s fate. The Israel terrorist premier, after all, is of the opinion that Israel reserves the right to resume fighting Hamas notwithstanding any ceasefire agreement, which kind of defeats the whole purpose.

On Tuesday, the Times of Israel terrorist reported that, although US officials persisted in insisting on “progress” in ceasefire negotiations, Israel’s Channel 12 news had learned that the “thorny issues” had been set aside for the time being: “The network said American mediators hope to reach agreements on other matters first, such as Israel’s ability to veto the release of some Palestinian security prisoners and exile others.”

The “thorny” stuff includes matters like whether Israel terrorist should be allowed to keep occupying the entire length of Gaza’s border with Egypt after the war. This issue would be “left to the very end of talks, according to the [Channel 12] report, which quoted officials saying they don’t believe Hamas chief Sinwar will budge on the Gaza-Egypt border unless he feels the [Israel terrorist military] is closing in on him,” The Times of Israel reported.

Per the diplomatic hallucinations of White House national security spokesperson John Kirby, delaying tactics in the interest of enabling the perpetual occupation of whatever remains of the Gaza Strip are apparently indicative of “constructive” talks.

And in the meantime, of course, genocide proceeds apace, as the Israel terrorist military goes about inflicting unceasing terror and starvation on the civilian population. Access to water and aid delivery has now been restricted in the city of Deir el-Balah in central Gaza, where the United Nations has been forced to shut down operations once again in order to abide by Israel terrorist’s pathological evacuation orders.

To be sure, Israel terrorist’s habit of commanding Palestinians to evacuate an area and then bombing them when they comply is hardly “constructive”.

The New York Times dispatch on US assistance in the “hunt” for Sinwar quotes a senior Israeli official on the “priceless” nature of US intelligence support. But as the United States continues buying Israel terrorist time for the obliteration of the status quo ante in Gaza along with all pretences to human decency and morality, the world itself will pay the price.

Donate for Palestine

BANK	Account Number
BANK BCA :	0952397051
BANK BNI	1791507534
BTN :	1501700001999
DIGIBANK : Foreign Currency A.N	2074864818
Confirm	ahahanafiah5@gmail.com

Donate for Palestine

BANK	Account Number
BANK BCA :	0952397051
BANK BNI	1791507534
BTN :	1501700001999
DIGIBANK : Foreign Currency A.N	2074864818
Confirm	ahahanafiah5@gmail.com

Zuckerberg expresses regrets over covid misinformation crackdown

In a letter to GOP leader, Meta CEO says Biden administration was “wrong” to pressure tech firms on content moderation.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifying at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in January. (Matt McClain/The Washington Post)

by Will Oremus

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) that the Biden administration in 2021 “repeatedly pressured” his company to take down certain posts related to covid and was “wrong” to do so.

“In 2021, senior officials from the Biden administration, including the White House, repeatedly pressured our teams for months to censor certain covid-19 content, including humor and satire, and expressed a lot of frustration with our teams when we didn’t agree,” Zuckerberg wrote in the letter sent Sunday. “Ultimately, it was our decision whether or not to take content down."

Zuckerberg also reiterated that Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Threads, had erred in temporarily suppressing a 2020 New York Post story about Hunter Biden’s laptop and said the company has since changed its policies to avoid any similar move. Specifically, he said Meta’s social networks would no longer “demote” potentially false posts or stories while it awaits a verdict from its fact-checking partners. Instead, it will wait for the results of the fact checks before taking any action.

The letter to Jordan shows Meta attempting to mend fences with the political right ahead of the 2024 election, amid a years-long, ongoing Republican-led investigation into the content moderation policies of major social media networks. While President Joe Biden and other Democratic leaders have criticized the company at times for failing to rein in false information about the 2020 election and the pandemic, Jordan and other House Republicans have been vocal in accusing Meta and other tech giants of overreacting by “censoring” conservatives’ speech.

In June, the Supreme Court rejected a bid led by Republican state attorneys general to restrict contacts between the White House and tech companies. And in July, it threw out lower-court decisions that would have limited social networks’ right to moderate users’ posts.

Zuckerberg’s letter marks the first time Meta has weighed in publicly on the lawsuit brought by the Republican attorneys general, which alleges that the Biden administration’s pressure on it and other tech giants to crack down on covid-19 misinformation amounted to illegal censorship. The Meta chief’s use of the word “censor” mirrors that of Jordan and other Republicans, as does his criticism of the Biden administration.

But Zuckerberg also said Meta’s content moderation actions were its own and not the result of government compulsion — a characterization consistent with the Supreme Court’s ruling that the plaintiffs failed to show a direct connection between government pressure and the removal of their posts.

"We own our decisions, including Covid-19-related changes we made to our enforcement in the wake of this pressure,” Zuckerberg wrote.

He added: “I feel strongly that we should not compromise our content standards due to pressure from any Administration in either direction — and we’re ready to push back if something like this happens again.”

Zuckerberg’s criticism of the Biden administration and pledge to pull back on demoting potentially false content was greeted as a victory by some on the right.

“Big win for free speech,” the House Judiciary Republicans posted on X

Mark Zuckerberg just admitted three things:

1. Biden-Harris Admin "pressured" Facebook to censor Americans.

2. Facebook censored Americans.

3. Facebook throttled the Hunter Biden laptop story.

Big win for free speech. pic.twitter.com/ALlbZd9l6K

— House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@JudiciaryGOP) August 26, 2024

The announcement that Meta will no longer demote stories flagged as potential violations of its misinformation policies could mean that falsehoods will circulate more freely on its networks before and after a contentious 2024 presidential election. Since suspending Donald Trump in the wake of the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection, Meta and other major tech firms have reinstated him and lifted restrictions on his accounts.

Also in the letter, Zuckerberg confirmed reports that he will no longer donate money for local election infrastructure through the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, a program that some called “Zuckerbucks.” The Washington Post reported this month that he would no longer support the program — potentially leaving funding gaps for elections in small jurisdictions.

“They were designed to be nonpartisan — spread across urban, rural and suburban communities,” Zuckerberg wrote. “Still, despite the analyses I’ve seen showing otherwise, I know that some people believe this work benefited one party over the other. My goal is to be neutral and not play a role one way or another — or to even appear to be playing a role. So I don’t plan on making a similar contribution this cycle.”

Katie Harbath, CEO of the tech consultancy Anchor Change and a former Facebook official, said she has “conflicting reactions” to Zuckerberg’s letter. While she said the effort to clear the air with House Republicans ahead of the election is understandable, she questioned Zuckerberg’s decision to address Republicans’ concerns but not those of Democrats, who see Jordan’s committee as applying undue government pressure of its own.

“Reflection on how they do moderation decisions in times of crisis is good,” Harbath said. “I’d just like to see that be done in a more neutral way.”

David Kaye, a professor at UC Irvine School of Law and former U.N. special rapporteur on freedom of expression, was more critical of the letter, which he called “cynical” and “obsequious.”

Zuckerberg’s missive, he said, “reinforces the sense of many activists around the world that Zuckerberg does not necessarily stand with his rules but can be swayed by government pressure — even while his letter tries to disclaim that perception.”

Meta declined to comment beyond confirming the letter’s authenticity.

Durov’s arrest represents persecution of alternative viewpoints – Maduro

FILE PHOTO: Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro ©Getty Images/Carlos Becerra/Stringer

The arrest of Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov in France aligns with a broader policy of using maximum pressure to control alternative media platforms, according to Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.

He made the remarks on Monday during his address at the 11th summit of the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA). Maduro noted that the ALBA meeting was being broadcast on the Telegram platform.

This is “despite the fact that their president [Telegram CEO Pavel Durov] was taken into custody as part of this policy of persecution, maximum pressure, blackmail, arm-twisting of alternative social and communication networks,” Maduro stated, adding that “power is abused across the world. They persecute in order to subjugate.”

Durov was arrested at Paris-Le Bourget Airport on Saturday immediately after arriving from Azerbaijan by private jet. The Russian entrepreneur is also a citizen of France, the UAE, and St. Kitts and Nevis.

The French judicial authorities have twice extended Durov’s detention. The Paris Public Prosecutor’s Office has stated that he was arrested as part of a broad criminal inquiry in relation to an unnamed person.

Durov has previously stated that his commitment to user privacy has made him a target for intelligence agencies. In an interview with American journalist Tucker Carlson earlier this year, Durov said he had rejected requests from Washington to share user data with US authorities or build so-called surveillance “backdoors” into the platform.

Telegram is a popular messaging app with nearly a billion users globally. It offers end-to-end encryption, enhancing privacy for both sender and recipient, and generally refuses to provide user data or chat records to law enforcement. According to Durov, Telegram respects the rights of its users to privacy and freedom of expression.

The tech mogul’s arrest has sparked strong reactions and concern over the future of free speech, with X (formerly Twitter) owner Elon Musk describing it as “dangerous times” and calling for Durov to be released. Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic has compared the case to the persecution of Edward Snowden and Julian Assange.

Snowden, a whistleblower who revealed the extent of NSA spying on Americans and foreign leaders back in 2012, has accused France of holding Durov “hostage” in order to access private communications on Telegram.

Snowden, a whistleblower who revealed the extent of NSA spying on Americans and foreign leaders back in 2012, has accused France of holding Durov “hostage” in order to access private communications on Telegram.

Pepe Escobar: EU to Telegram - We're Coming to Get You

The Pavel Durov saga is a gift that will keep on giving for a long time to come. This is what hot information war is all about. So let’s attempt to connect several loose ends.

A high-level Russian analyst makes the case that Durov’s arrest is connected with “anti-French protests in its former colonies, withdrawal from its traditional 'sphere of influence' where Telegram infrastructure was used to push anti-colonial and anti-Macronist narratives”.

Add to it an “attempt to influence narratives on Ukraine both in Russian and the international media field, which is highly dependent on Telegram infrastructure.”

Paris is indeed desperate to make itself relevant when it comes to psy ops and influencing/special warfare in Ukraine.

However, as the analyst notes, the French don’t have the tech means to accomplish it. So this may have led to Macron deciding to “exercise a personal pressure campaign against Durov himself. French authorities must be rather desperate in trying to keep their heads in the game of global politics. And Telegram today is (his italics) global politics.”

Paris was just waiting for a big break. When the pilot of Durov’s Embraer private jet submitted his flight plan, there was no warrant for his arrest in France. Only when the jet was on its way to Le Bourget, Paris filed the warrant in haste. Durov was clueless all along.

In a nutshell: Paris got a fateful heads up he was flying into France – could have been via Durov’s Dubai-based, post-obsessive, social climbing girlfriend – and laid out the trap in a flash.

An Eminence in Jail

There’s a myth that the FSB in the past asked Durov for Telegram’s encryption keys. False. The FSB wanted Telegram to provide top access on investigations of serious crimes, on a case-by-case basis. That’s an enormous difference compared to what the US Government does with Meta or Twitter/X via their totally open backdoors.

Durov though got drunk on NATOstan’s “freedom and democracy” propaganda, rebuffed Russia, and left.

And that brings us to President Putin. Putin had better things to do than to meet Durov in Baku, and the Kremlin has gone on the record to deny the meeting. Durov was doing a tour of Central Asia and the Caucasus, they happened to cross their paths in Azerbaijan.

There’s one thing that Putin never tolerates: betrayal of Russia. And that applies to the letter to Durov. When Durov went to the US, the Americans, predictably, demanded Telegram’s backdoors to surveil everybody. So he set up shop in Dubai and later applied for French citizenship.

Durov became a French citizen only 3 years ago – significantly, before the launch of the SMO - via a special “eminent foreigner” program set up by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Very few are eligible; only a “French-speaking foreigner who contributes through their eminent action to the influence of France and the prosperity of its international economic relations”.

Well, no “eminent action” was enough to keep him away from a French slammer.

How to Get Those Keys

The European Commission (EC) in Brussels can be summarily described as a notorious bunch of EUrocrat cowards and/or psychopaths cheerfully praising “our values”.

Predictably, the EC refuses to comment on Durov’s arrest, saying it's a "national investigation".

An "investigation" which happens to have been “encouraged” by the US Deep State, carried out since July 8 by vassal Macronist police, to the benefit of NATO and... the European Commission itself.

The charges against Durov revealed by France’s Prosecutor of the Republic should be destroyed in court by any crack legal team. Essentially, the claims are that Durov himself is responsible for those abusing Telegram. He is “complicit” of every misdeed under the sun – from organized fraud to drug-trafficking – all the way to a hazy accusation of providing encrypted services without a “certified declaration”.

The accusations about Telegram’s lack of moderation are false. For instance, Telegram actively censors correspondence inside the EU; EU residents cannot access countless chats and channels. Moreover, Telegram is not concerned by the recent, hardcore neo-Orwellian EU law against mega social networks, because it harbors less than 45 million European users a day.

Now let’s focus on motive.

The current liberal-totalitarian Euro-gulag, or EuroLag, is a massive power bloc that does not have access to Telegram’s content.

Telegram maintains its own servers around the world, and routing goes via Amazon, Cloudfare and Google. Since the start of Telegram, US intel/surveillance has the means to easily block it - if they feel like it.

The EU is a different ball game. So here we have Brussels, via Paris, trying to acquire at least some control over Telegram – and social networks in general.

A crucial reminder – which could be billed under the Pathetic Tech department: Europe has no (italics mine) social networks.

The key question now is: will they get it by applying pressure over Pavel Durov? There’s no evidence he has Telegram’s encryption keys. What if they got the wrong guy?

Nikolai Durov, Pavels’ ultra-discreet brother, is the prime genius architect of Telegram: math master, two PhDs, gold medals in the International Mathematical Olympiad. The French would rather cut a deal – thus the extended interrogation: but that would imply breaking Pavel so he would influence Nikolai to hand over those fabled keys.

Why Now? And Who Profits?

Predictably, Durov’s interrogation goes on with zero transparence. France is an excruciatingly secretive society, prone to absolute silence on serious matters, nerve-wracking slow, punctuated by rare formal declarations. It’s all about procedure – and the bureaucracy is stultifying.

Yet French bureaucracy may have given a precious hint on what really bothers them. They simply cannot accept that anyone uses – or provides – the means of “obfuscation” in terms of financial transactions, bypassing censorship and bypassing surveillance.

So this may go way beyond the obsession to get some or all of Telegram’s encryption keys. The French bureaucratic apparatus wants to go no holds barred to suppress any possibility of any bypassing – while retaining the power to punish anyone.

If the saga goes on and on, leading to a trial and eventually a 20-year prison sentence, that means Durov would not be broken facing the bureaucratic apparatus, and he will always remain “an accomplice”.

Hardly likely. Bye bye to unlimited glitz and glamour, in exchange for a daily stale baguette in a French gaol?

Two more inevitable questions. Why now? Because the EU needs it, badly. And who profits? The leading candidates are the “esprit de corps” of ultra-regimented French bureaucracy and their Franco-European oligarch connections. Envy is also in the cards. Durov is Russian, an outsider, and Telegram – with a billion users worldwide – is a resounding success.

Anything can happen further on down the road – including the blocking of Telegram in France and the EU. The Global Majority could not care less. Meanwhile, multitudes marvel at how a narcissist tech globalist could be so naïve to believe that liberal totalitarianism would ever protect his freedom.

Pepe Escobar

Pepe Escobar is the roving correspondent for Asia Times/Hong Kong, an analyst for RT and TomDispatch, and a frequent contributor to websites and radio shows ranging from the US to East Asia. Born in Brazil, he's been a foreign correspondent since 1985, and has lived in London, Paris, Milan, Los Angeles, Washington, Bangkok and Hong Kong.
Pepe Escobar - Sputnik International