Tuesday 26 March 2024

How US Facilitated Creation of Terror Groups Like ISIS

How US Facilitated Creation of Terror Groups Like ISIS

How US Facilitated Creation of Terror Groups Like ISIS





©AP Photo






In their efforts to draw suspicion away from Ukraine by pinning the blame on the Crocus City Hall terrorist attack on ISIS*, US political strategists who came up with this ploy effectively backed themselves into a corner, said Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova.







Just like the US meddling in Afghanistan in the 1980s paved the way for the rise of al-Qaeda*, the 2003 US invasion and subsequent de facto occupation of Iraq resulted in the creation of ISIS, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova elaborated in her recent op-ed.


Her assessment was shared by Hasan Abdullah, a political scientist at Global Security & Strategy Institute and expert on Islamic militancy, who noted that the US actions in Afghanistan during the Soviet military intervention produced a “conducive environment which was created for the emergence of many groups” that would later “operate in neighboring countries as well.”


“You can talk about al-Qaeda as well. Al-Qaeda was one of the groups that emerged from there. So, you could say that the environment that was created, did ultimately pave the way for al-Qaeda as well,” he said.


The United States’ attempts to wage a proxy war against the USSR in Afghanistan resulted in the emergence of “a completely new generation of Mujahideen with the Jihadi mindset that still haunts world's peace,” added Syed Fakhar Kakakhel, a Peshawar-based senior journalist who specializes in covering politics and militancy in Afghanistan and Pakistan.


“Central Asian militant outfits like the East Turkestan Islamic Movement* (ETIM) and Uzbekistan Islamic Movement* (IMU) were made after inspiration by the Afghan Jihad,” Kakakhel explained. “Those were the times when the Arab fighters poured into this region among them was a Saudi Sheikh Osama Bin Laden, founder of al-Qaeda. It was the same al-Qaeda that hit back at the United States with the 9/11 terror attack killing hundreds of innocent American citizens.”


The so-called War on Terror unleased upon the world by the United States and its NATO allies in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, including the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 and the invasion of Iraq in 2003, opened a whole new can of worms.


The US invasion, illegal as it was, led to the radicalization of many groups and individuals in Iraq who, as Abdullah put it, “felt that it was their religious or, in the case of many secular groups, nationalist duty to fight against an invader.”


“It was the US invasion of Iraq due to the [alleged but ultimately false] presence of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) that led to [Iraqi al-Qaeda leader] Abu Musab Al Zarqawi moving to Iraq and starting fighting against the Western troops in Iraq. He was the one who built training camps in Syria thus destabilizing the whole region,” said Kakakhel. “Later on, it was revealed that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.”


It was due to “the wars in Afghanistan and the Middle East by the West” that “militant organizations like al-Qaeda, ETIM*, IMU*, and ISIS have been created, putting global peace at risk,” he added. The US withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 did little to improve things in the region, in no small part because the fleeing US troops left behind military hardware and equipment worth billions of dollars.


“The neighboring countries to Afghanistan believe that now different militant organizations are using these weapons against them. We have witnessed a huge surge in attacks in Pakistan and Iran by religious extremist organizations equipped with these latest weapons,” Kakakhel remarked.


Meanwhile, Abdullah observed that the United States appears content to turn a blind eye to the emergence of terrorist organizations in the world because powerful groups, companies and lobbies in the US benefit from instability and war.


“In many cases, we find this convergence of interest between those terrorist organizations and the American ruling elite. When you look at that context, it's understandable why this convergence of interest can sometimes pave the way for the Americans allowing some of these terrorist organizations to grow in mushroom,” he mused.


Regarding the United States refusing Russia’s proposal back in 2015 to form a global anti-ISIS front, Abdullah speculated that the US simply “does not want Russia to take any credit.” “The Russian proposals could have been very instrumental and the Americans did not want the Russians to get credit for initiating such a proposal and putting together a coalition that could have been beneficial for the international community at large. I think that's the fundamental reason,” he said.


Abdullah pointed out a curious tendency: while the “biggest victims of ISIS have actually been the Muslims,” the “biggest beneficiaries” of the terrorist group’s activities “have actually been a number of Western powers.”


Also, a number of figures within ISIS “turned out to be people connected to Western intelligence organizations or even who had been part of various Western special forces or intelligence organizations,” he added.


Lastly, the Arabic writing on the ISIS flag is a Jewish Hebrew style.





















Monday 25 March 2024

US bails Ukraine out after Moscow attack, covering Zelensky with ISIS — diplomat

US bails Ukraine out after Moscow attack, covering Zelensky with ISIS — diplomat

US bails Ukraine out after Moscow attack, covering Zelensky with ISIS — diplomat





Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova
©Mikhail Tereshchenko/ TASS






After the Crocus City Hall attack, the US tries to bail Ukraine out by mentioning the Islamic State (IS, ISIS, outlawed in Russia) terror group, outlawed in Russia, and to cover itself and the Zelensky regime it created, Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said in an article for kp.ru.







"The American political engineers cornered themselves with their tales that the Crocus City Hall attack was carried out by the ISIS terror group," the diplomat noted. "Hence Washington’s daily bailing out of its wards in Kiev, and the attempt to cover itself and the Zelensky regime they created with the scarecrow of the outlawed ISIS."


Zakharova noted that a number of factors directly and indirectly indicate the US authorities’ involvement in sponsoring the Ukrainian terrorism.


"Billions of dollar and an unprecedented amount of weapons, invested without accountability and with use of corruption schemes into the Kiev regime, the aggressive rhetoric regarding Russia, the rabid nationalism, the ban for peace talks on Ukraine, the endless calls for a force resolution of the conflict, the refusal to condemn the years-long terror attacks, carried out by the Kiev regime, and the massive informational and political support of any, even the most atrocious actions of Zelensky," she listed.


The spokeswoman also noted that previously, the US intervention in Middle Eastern affairs has led to the emergence, strengthening and institutionalization of a number of radical and terrorist groups that remain active in the region even today.


"What is the logic, you may ask? Money and power. And, considering the international legal ban on direct interventions, it is also about sowing a ‘controlled chaos’ and reshaping the world order by the hands of terrorists," she continued. "Attention, a question for the White House: are you sure it was ISIS, won’t you change your mind later?"



World must unite to find masterminds of terrorist attack near Moscow — Russian ombudswoman



The international community must unite to find the masterminds of the terrorist attack late last week on a crowded concert at Crocus City Hall in suburban Moscow, Russian Human Rights Commissioner Tatyana Moskalkova said.


Russian Human Rights Commissioner Tatyana Moskalkova
©Mikhail Metzel/ TASS


"It is very important for the entire world community to unite today to find the masterminds and hold them accountable to the fullest extent," Moskalkova said at a makeshift memorial near the site of the attack.


The ombudswoman also expressed condolences to the families and loved ones of the deceased, wished a speedy recovery to those who were affected by this "monstrous, bloody terrorist attack." "Of course, the heart is filled not only with pain but also with hatred towards those who were able to commit this monstrous act," Moskalkova said.


On the evening of March 22, a terrorist attack targeted the Crocus City Hall music venue in Krasnogorsk, Moscow Region, just over the Moscow city limits. According to the Russian Investigative Committee, the current death toll is 137, but may rise. The Moscow Region Health Ministry said that 182 people were injured. Eleven individuals suspected of being involved in the terrorist attack have been apprehended, including four gunmen who were detained in the Bryansk Region, southwest of Moscow, as they attempted to seek refuge by crossing the nearby Ukrainian border. President Vladimir Putin said in a televised address that, according to preliminary information, the Ukrainian side had prepared "a window" in the border especially for the terrorists to cross undetected. He promised to identify and punish all those who were behind the attack on Crocus City Hall and declared March 24 a day of national mourning for the victims.



Macron extends hand to Russia in anti-terror efforts



France is ready to work with with Russia to fight terrorism, French President Emmanuel Macron said, commenting on Friday’s terror attack on Crocus City Hall near Moscow.


"We are in talks at all levels, both technical and ministerial, to possibly offer our cooperation based on the information that we have at our disposal and that could be of use to the Russian side," the French leader said upon arriving in French Guiana, according to a video of his meeting with the press posted on the French presidency’s page on X.


Of course, this is Macron's ploy which aims to obscure the mastermind behind this terror act.





















Israeli attacks kill over 50 Palestinians in central, southern Gaza

Israeli attacks kill over 50 Palestinians in central, southern Gaza

Israeli attacks kill over 50 Palestinians in central, southern Gaza











Israeli air strikes kill at least 22 Palestinians in central Gaza’s Deir al Balah region and 30 in Rafah in the south.







Israel's military carried out new airstrikes in Gaza and laid siege to two hospitals on Monday, despite what the U.N. chief called a growing international consensus to tell Israel a ceasefire is needed.


U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres also issued a new call to Israel to allow aid in to northern Gaza to combat starvation after more than five months of war and not to carry out a threatened assault on the southern Gazan city of Rafah.


"It is absolutely essential to have a massive supply of humanitarian aid now," Guterres said during a visit to Jordan. Rafah, the last refuge for about half of Gaza's 2.3 million population after many people arrived in search of shelter after being displaced by fighting elsewhere, came under heavy fire in the latest Israeli attacks, witnesses said.


Palestinian medics said 30 people had been killed in the previous 24 hours in Rafah, where Israel is planning a ground assault to eliminate what it says are Palestinian militant cells there.


Palestinians who fled the ongoing Israeli siege of al-Shifa Hospital say Israeli tanks and armoured bulldozers drove over at least four bodies and ambulances.


"The past 24 hours were one of the worst days since we moved in to Rafah," said Abu Khaled, a father of seven, who declined to give his full name for fear of reprisals.


"In Rafah, we live in fear, we are hungry, we are homeless and our future is unknown. With no ceasefire in sight, we might end up dead or displaced somewhere else, maybe north and maybe south (to Egypt)," he told Reuters via a chat app.


Dozens of Palestinians took part in rallies and attended funerals early on Monday after an Israeli airstrike killed 18 Palestinians in one house in Deir Al-Balah in central Gaza, medics and witnesses said.


Israeli forces were also besieging Al-Amal and Nasser hospitals in the southern city of Khan Younis, Palestinian witnesses said, a week after entering Al Shifa hospital in Gaza City, the main hospital in the Strip.


Israel says hospitals in Gaza are used by the Palestinian militant group Hamas as bases. Hamas and medical staff deny this. Israel also says its military operations are "precise" and that it does not target civilians.


The Israeli military said it had detained 500 people affiliated with Hamas and the allied Islamic Jihad and located weapons in the Al Shifa area. The health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza said hundreds of patients and medical staff had been detained there.


Israel's military also said 20 militants had been "eliminated" in fighting and airstrikes around Al Amal Hospital over the previous 24 hours.


It has been unable to access Gaza's contested hospital areas and verify accounts by either side.



PALESTINIAN ROCKET FIRE



Palestinian cross-border rocket attacks have tapered off in recent weeks as Israeli forces advanced through areas in the Gaza Strip from where missiles have previously been fired.


But, in a sign the Hamas arsenal has not been completely depleted, Israel's military on Monday sounded sirens in Ashdod, 40 km (25 miles) from Gaza, warning of incoming rockets. Medics said there was no immediate word of any damage or casualties.


At least 32,333 Palestinians have been killed and 74,694 injured since Israel's offensive in Gaza began, including 107 Palestinians killed in the past 24 hours, the Gaza health ministry said.





















Donate for Palestine





BANK Account Number
BANK BRI: 001201247978508
BANK BCA : 0952397051
BANK BNI : 1791507534
BANK Cimb Niaga : 707454936800
BANK RAYA : 001001424796315
BTN : 1501700001999
HANA's BANK : 14755057480
Bank Mandiri : 1330027242122
DIGIBANK :
Foreign Currency A.N
2074864818
Confirm : ahahanafiah5@gmail.com

















Watch Russian Attack Helicopters Wipe Out Ukrainian Military Hardware in Special Op Zone

Watch Russian Attack Helicopters Wipe Out Ukrainian Military Hardware in Special Op Zone

Watch Russian Attack Helicopters Wipe Out Ukrainian Military Hardware in Special Op Zone











Russian army aviation is tasked with destroying Ukrainian armored vehicles, delivering troops and military cargo, as well as providing air support to units carrying out missions.







The Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) has released an army aviation video of the Russian Aerospace Forces destroying camouflaged military equipment and engineering structures of the Ukrainian Army in the Kupyansk area.


The footage shows the crews of the army aviation’s strike group launching a strike on the enemy positions with the help of the S-8 unguided air missiles.


Shortly after, the crews performed an anti-missile maneuver using the onboard defense complex and successfully returned to the departure airfield, according to the MoD.


The strike group included Ka-52 and the Mi-35M attack helicopters, as well as a Mi-8 multi-purpose gunship.



Watch Russian Sharpshooter Take Out Ukrainian Troops One by One



Russian snipers are highly trained elite troops who operate covertly, striking the enemy from the shadows with the principle of "one round – one enemy down".






The Russian Ministry of Defense released footage showcasing snipers in action within the special military operation zone. The video depicts sharpshooters thwarting Ukrainian maneuvers in Artemovsk (formerly known as Bakhmut) suburbs with precise and lethal strikes.


The ministry emphasized the collaborative efforts of the snipers, working in pairs. While one sniper assists in locating targets and adjusts fire according to external conditions such as wind, the other executes the shot, swiftly neutralizing the enemy.



Russian Troops Improve Positions Around Avdeyevka - MoD



Russia’s Ministry of Defense reported on the progress of special military operation.


Ukraine lost up to 465 troops over the last 24 hours, said the Russian Ministry of Defense in a statement. In Donetsk, the Ukrainian Army lost a tank and US-made Bradley IFV while Russian artillerymen managed to obliterate a Ukrainian Krab howitzer and other military equipment.


©Sputnik/Alexey Maishev/Go to the mediabank


Over the given period, the Russian military also repelled 10 counterattacks by Ukrainian troops in the Avdeyevka vicinity and one attack in the Kupyansk vicinity.


Russian military forces also enhanced their positions near Avdeyevka, the Ministry of Defense reported.


"Near Avdeyevka, as a result of successful actions by units of the Tsentr Battlegroup, positions along the front line have been improved," the military department stated.


The Russian Armed Forces conducted strikes on Ukrainian troops in 142 locations, using aviation, drones and missiles while Russian air defenses downed 103 Ukrainian UAVs.


The Russian Army also eliminated Ukrainian electronic warfare stations, including two Nota and Anklav-N units, as well as US-made AN/TPQ-48 counter-battery radar station.


In total, since the start of special military operation, the Russian Armed Forces has obliterated 577 airplanes and 270 helicopters, as well as over 17,000 drones. The Russian Army hammered over 15,000 Ukrainian tanks and almost 500 air defense missile systems.


Earlier, Russian Ambassador to the United Nations Vassily Nebenzia said that Russia has successfully achieved its goal of demilitarizing Ukraine since the Kiev regime's army has long been surviving only due to weapon supplies from NATO countries.





















The US is cultivating an antagonist to China in Beijing’s own backyard

The US is cultivating an antagonist to China in Beijing’s own backyard

The US is cultivating an antagonist to China in Beijing’s own backyard





Philippines' President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. at the ASEAN-Australia Special Summit 2024 in Melbourne.
©Penny STEPHENS / ASEAN-Australia Special Summit 2024 / AFP






The Philippines has been a treaty ally of the United States since 1951, almost as long as it’s been an independent country. Before that, it was a colony of the US, which had won it as spoils of war from Spain. Because of this, it is hard to characterise the Philippines as anything but an unabashedly pro-American nation.







In the past few years however, it took a different line. Under the presidency of the very blunt and frank Rodrigo Duterte, the archipelago became more geopolitically ambiguous in its foreign affairs, pursuing closer relationships with Russia and China, while still being cordial to the US.


This unusual “hedging” was part of Duterte’s strategy to adopt a more centralised approach to governing the country, which suffers from high levels of poverty, crime and disorder. Duterte was a hardliner, and also saw economic opportunity in getting closer to Beijing, despite highly contentious disputes over the South China Sea. His relationship with Washington suffered during this period, as it effectively contributed nothing to the development of the country despite the US post-colonial “overlordship”. Instead, Duterte opted for the Belt and Road initiative and sought to turbocharge the islands with Chinese investment.


Yet, just a year or so after Duterte’s departure, the return to power of the Marcos family has seen Manilla do an effective 180° turn in its foreign policy, and go from being pro-Beijing to an effective antagonist of the country in favour of the US again. Ferdinand Macros Jr, also known as “Bongbong,” is the son of Ferdinand Marcos, who ruled the Philippines as a right-wing, anti-Communist dictator from the mid-1960s to the mid-1980s. The family was notorious for its corruption and theft of national assets for its own personal gain, but got away with it precisely because it was unequivocally pro-US. For during the Cold War, Washington would support figures of any brutality on the condition that they were anti-Communist.


Bongbong, like is father, is not innocent, and was elected president of the Philippines as a compromised man who is at the mercy of the US. Ironically, he faces prosecution in the US as a court order requires him to pay $353 million to victims of his father’s regime, thus he cannot enter the country. What does this translate to in political terms?


Leverage, on Washington’s behalf. Noticeably, the American authorities do little to enforce the ruling or seize assets pertaining to Marcos or his family, for diplomatic reasons. What is the quid pro quo here? It is clear that as long as Bongbong steers the Philippines' foreign policy where the US wants it, Washington will look the other way when it comes to the court order against him.


And it is absolutely no surprise that on attaining office, Marcos Jr initiated a U-turn on the country’s stance regarding China, and has dramatically escalated tensions with Beijing. While the Duterte administration sought to keep matters cool over the South China Sea territorial dispute, Marcos Jr has deliberately antagonised Beijing, pushing boundaries, and drawing international attention to the situation, provoking the US to say it will defend the Philippines in the event of conflict. Similarly, dozens of senior US officials have visited the country as part of a sweeping US charm offensive.


But not only that, he has agreed to increase the number of bases the US can access in the Philippines, has congratulated Taiwan’s president-elect, actively scaled back Manila's participation in the Belt and Road initiative by cancelling a number of projects, and has instead sought to court a relationship with Japan as an alternative to China, with the US, Japan and the Philippines set to have a trilateral leaders’ summit for the first time.


In a nutshell, the Philippines has gone from being a China-friendly state in Southeast Asia to easily the most antagonistic, a difficult position to take, due to the relative economic weakness of the country and its trade dependence on China.


For China, this situation is a headache and there are no easy answers. This is because Beijing has a resolute and uncompromising position on the South China Sea, most of which it claims as its own. The rigidity of this position not only clashes with Southeast Asian states but creates an easy political wedge for the US to exploit.


China makes itself look weak if it backs down, and US policy of course is to incentivise such countries to actively resist Beijing and give them the military backing to do so. So how can China mend its relations with the Philippines? It may simply have to avoid creating a crisis and wait until a more Beijing-friendly president is voted into office, because quite clearly, Marcos Jr is a compromised politician, with Washington being able to exploit his weakness and disastrous family legacy to its own advantage.





















Moscow concert hall terror attack suspects brought before court- Video

Moscow concert hall terror attack suspects brought before court- Video

Moscow concert hall terror attack suspects brought before court- Video











A Moscow court has convened late on Sunday to hear prosecutors demands on pre-trial detention for a group of men detained in the aftermath of Friday’s Crocus City Hall attack, which claimed lives of over 130 people.







The suspects, all of whom are nationals of Tajikistan, have appeared before court individually. Thus far, it has placed terrorism charges on 32-year-old Dalerdzhon Mirzoyev, with the man facing a life sentence if found guilty. Prosecutors told Judge Timur Vakhrameev that he had admitted his guilt.


The court has opted to rule behind closed doors.






Footage from the scene shows the suspect confined to a glass cage in the courtroom.


It has emerged that Mirzoyev is the father of four children. He has been placed in two-month pre-trial detention, which is standard practice in Russia in cases of this nature.






The second man, Saidakrami Rachabalizod, has also reportedly pleaded guilty. He has one child and appeared with his right ear bandaged, having sustained an injury to it during his arrest. He has also been remanded in custody for two months.






The court has also received petitions for the arrest of two more defendants – Muhammadsobir Fayzov and Shamsidin Fariduni.


The suspects, who are also facing terrorism charges, have been already transferred to the court.