Sunday, 7 May 2023

Jordan Neely killing by Daniel Penny - lack of arrest highlights racial disparities in charging

Jordan Neely killing by Daniel Penny - lack of arrest highlights racial disparities in charging

Daniel Penny Identified As the Man Who Choked Jordan Neely to Death: Live Updates




Photo: Juan Vazquez






Daniel Penny, a 24-year-old Marine Corps veteran from Queens, has been publicly identified as the man who killed Jordan Neely after placing him in a lethal choke hold on Monday. His identity had been a mystery since then with several news outlets speaking to him but not publishing his name and authorities refusing to reveal who he was. After online sleuths published his information on Thursday night, the press followed.







Daniel Penny’s attorney, Thomas Kenniff, released a statement on Friday night in which he claimed Penny had acted “to protect” himself and other passengers after Neely “began aggressively threatening” them. Kenniff insisted Penny “never intended to harm Mr. Neely and could not have foreseen his untimely death.” The statement also pointed to Neely’s “documented history of violent and erratic behavior” and decried the mental-health crisis in the city.



What happened?



On Monday afternoon, Penny was seen choking Neely, 30, aboard an F train in an encounter captured on video. During the nearly four-minute video, Penny is seen wrapped around Neely’s back on the ground with both arms tight across his neck. Neely struggles as another unidentified man holds his arms by the wrist. The conductor and others can be heard calling for police, and after about two minutes, a bystander gets inside the train car and warns Penny: “If you suffocate him, that’s it. You don’t want to catch a murder charge.” Shortly after, Penny releases the choke hold and the men roll Neely, who appears to be unconscious, onto his side. Neely was later pronounced dead at a nearby hospital.






Officers questioned Penny and released him. Later, the medical examiner’s office determined that Neely died from compression of his neck, ruling his death to be a homicide.



Who is Penny?



Penny graduated from West Islip High School in 2016, in the bedroom community on Long Island’s South Shore, about a 90-minute drive from Manhattan. In 2017, he joined the Marines. His lawyer said Penny is currently a college student. The Washington Post notes that according to his service records, Penny served as a rifleman until 2021, reached the rank of sergeant, and was deployed with the 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit to the Mediterranean.


For a time, Penny lived at his grandfather’s house in West Islip, according to Willy Horan, who purchased the waterfront home from Penny’s grandfather in 2019. Horan took a break from his yard work Friday morning to lament both Neely’s death and Penny’s circumstances. “It’s unfortunate it had to end with a 30-year-old dying. But the kid was threatened, he’s a marine, what was he supposed to do?” Horan wondered. “Tell Adams, ‘Now that he’s got the rats under control, it’s time to address mental illness.’”


In a bio on the service-industry-job site Harri, Penny wrote that his experience as a squad leader on two deployments led him to realize he was “passionate” about “helping, communicating, and connecting to different people from all over the world.”



Will he be charged?



Prosecutors and detectives are said to be considering potential charges for the veteran with the Manhattan DA’s office “weighing if the case should go to a grand jury to determine if charges should be brought,” according to the Daily News. Gothamist reports that the investigation is being led by Assistant District Attorney Joshua Steinglass, who it notes “is one of the office’s go-to lawyers on high-profile, violent crimes.”


Catherine Christian, an attorney who spent 30 years in the Manhattan DA’s office, told Gothamist that the video of the choke hold would not be enough for prosecutors to charge Penny with murder — as state law demands that prosecutors prove there was an intention to kill. If charges are filed, Christian said that it’s more likely to be second-degree manslaughter or criminally negligent homicide, which would require prosecutors to show that Penny was “not reasonably acting in self-defense,” per Gothamist.


With only one witness coming forward publicly so far, it’s essential to any potential case that more firsthand accounts are found. “I would hope that the police officers got the name and contact information of everyone in that subway car, because what people who weren’t in the car are saying is irrelevant,” Christian told Gothamist. “So I would want to know: What did they see? What did they hear?” On Thursday, the NYPD encouraged witnesses who have not come forward to share any information they may have about the attack.







As New York City authorities continue to investigate the killing of an unhoused Black man who was put into a chokehold by a white transit passenger, anger and frustration mounted over the lack of an arrest in the case, reinforcing longstanding racial disparities over who gets charged for crimes in the city and nationally.




“His killing is a reflection of deep racial bias in our society,” Donna Lieberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, told the Guardian on Friday. “And the way he was treated after death is a reflection of other biases with regard to people who suffer mental illness.


“This is about the devastating intersection of bias and failed policy. This is not just about New York City. New York City shapes society or reflects it.”


On 1 May, Jordan Neely, 30, reportedly yelled at passengers on a F train heading into Manhattan, pleading that he was hungry, homeless and thirsty when, in an apparent escalation, subway riders restrained him. Video footage showed a 24-year-old white former marine, identified as Daniel Penny, of Long Island, holding Neely in a chokehold for several minutes while another rider held the supine man’s arms.


Friends and family have described Neely as a sweet, loving and talented Michael Jackson impersonator who dealt with mental health challenges following his mother’s murder when he was a teenager.


Advocates argued that the circumstances surrounding Neely’s life and death, which the city’s medical examiner’s office ruled a homicide, reflected longstanding failures to provide social services to impoverished New Yorkers.


Criminal justice experts also told that the lack of an arrest in this case also illuminated broader disparities embedded in the US criminal justice system’s treatment of certain people, whether Black, impoverished or struggling with a disability.


“It also reflects the profound failed policies our city has pursued for decades,” Lieberman said. “Instead of providing mental health care, instead of providing housing, we provide police sweeping the streets.”


Activists also decried that Neely’s killer had not been immediately charged. Johnny Grima, 38, an activist with Tompkins Mutual Aid, said that Neely’s life was unvalued by law enforcement because he was an unhoused Black man with mental health issues.








“Jordan Neely to them is a piece of garbage. And it’s fucking sad ’cause he isn’t a piece of garbage,” said Grima, adding that police were also hesitant to charge Penny because he was a white marine.


“Had it been a white woman that was choked for 15 minutes, [the assailant] probably would’ve been arrested on sight,” Grima added.




Black Americans are disproportionately arrested, convicted and detained pre-trial compared with white Americans. A United Nations report on US criminal justice system disparities showed that Black Americans are also unevenly denied bail and then detained when they are unable to afford it. In this case, no charges had been filed as of late Friday, days after police questioned the white rider.


Lieberman argued that Neely’s killing “would almost certainly have never happened if he were not Black”, adding that she had “little doubt” police would have charged Penny if he were Black.


She and her colleague, Beth Haroules, a staff attorney at NYCLU and director of disability justice litigation, condemned the public release of Neely’s criminal record, which included dozens of charges ranging from alleged assault to lower-level offenses such as jumping subway turnstiles and carrying an open alcohol container.


Haroules called the dissemination of Neely’s record before the filing of charges against the white rider or any others involved in Neely’s death a “perversion of the investigative process”, adding that it “polluted” the ongoing investigation before it has concluded and would make it more difficult for jurors.


“The release of all the touches Neely has had with the criminal justice system is so stark and damning,” Haroules said. “No alternatives were made available to him or supported housing assistance with his mental health situation.”


When she heard about the case, she found it “shocking” that the rider took matters into his own hands. But she also found it “not surprising” given the heightened rhetoric from the New York City mayor, Eric Adams, and others around increasing police presence in subway stations to curtail crime as well as endorsing involuntarily hospitalizing people experiencing homelessness with mental illness, even as the city cuts services for those facing such challenges.


The white rider’s act of putting Neely in a chokehold, at a time when the New York police force is banned from using chokeholds, spoke to an environment in which “people felt empowered to take the law into their own hands” even as Neely did not appear to “create a risk of danger that was violent”, Haroules said.


She added: “It is very dangerous for our elected officials to continuously drill into people’s heads that men of color, unhoused, mentally ill on the subway are there and if you don’t get them down first, they will take you out.” New York’s governor, Kathy Hochul, called the attack “deeply disturbing”, telling Spectrum News NY1 that there are “consequences for behavior”.


Citing a source, ABC7 reported that a grand jury could convene next week to determine whether charges are appropriate.


Neely reportedly struggled after his mother’s death: When Neely was a teenager, his mother, Cynthia, was choked to death by an abusive boyfriend. He suffered a similar fate on Monday.


Haroules said that Neely’s death should be a “wake-up moment” for the city to decide how both officials and police want to treat unhoused people and those suffering from mental illness. She noted that she saw the “same playbook” arising as when police “engage in unlawful use of force” against a person, particularly those having a mental health crisis.


“We see it all the time,” she said. “The outcome is that the person in mental health crisis is killed or suffers pretty grievous harm.”


She added: “I don’t know what kind of justice can be had for Neely and his family.”














Multiple people killed in shooting at mall in Texas

Multiple people killed in shooting at mall in Texas

Multiple people killed in shooting at mall in Texas




Police respond to a shooting in the Dallas area's Allen Premium Outlets, which authorities said has left multiple people injured in Allen, Texas, U.S. May 6, 2023 in a still image from video. ABC Affiliate WFAA via REUTERS






Several people, including children were injured on Saturday in a shooting outside of a busy suburban Dallas mall and a suspect was dead, local media reported.







There was no word on the number of people injured or their condition at the Allen Premium Outlets mall where the shooting took place about 25 miles (40 km) northeast of Dallas.


Multiple people were wounded and the shooter was dead at the scene, local ABC affiliate WFAA TV reported, citing the Collin County Sheriff.


"He pretty much was walking down the sidewalk just ... shooting his gun outside," an eyewitness told the station. "He was just shooting his gun everywhere for the most part."


Video footage from local media showed police officers hurrying shoppers out of the mall, with squad cars and emergency vehicles parked near entryways.


WARNING: Sensitive content—Fox News' CB Cotton shares the latest on reports of 'multiple gunshots' at a mall in Allen, Texas, on 'Fox Report.'




Blood could be seen on sidewalks outside the mall and white sheets covering what appeared to be bodies.


Allen Police Department and Collin County officials were not immediately available to comment.


"Law enforcement is on the scene at Allen Premium Outlets. An active investigation is underway. Please avoid the area until further update," the Allen Police Department said in a Twitter post.




Texas Governor Greg Abbott, calling the shooting an "unspeakable tragedy", said in a written statement that the state was prepared to offer any assistance local authorities in Allen may need.







Allen, Texas, is a community of about 100,000 people.


Mass shootings have become commonplace in the United States, with at least 198 so far in 2023, the most at this point in the year since at least 2016, according to the Gun Violence Archive. The nonprofit group defines a mass shooting as any in which four or more people are wounded or killed, not including the shooter.


Police chief Brian Harvey said at a Saturday evening presser that a police officer was on an unrelated call nearby when gunshots erupted at Allen Premium Outlets at 3:36 p.m.


The officer "engaged the suspect and neutralized the threat," according to police. A law enforcement source told Fox News that the suspected shooter is dead.


Harvey said that nine people were transported to local hospitals, but it is unknown how many were killed. Local outlet WFAA-TV reported that the victims included children, though Fox News has not independently confirmed that.


The ATF Dallas Field Division announced that it was responding to an active shooting situation on Twitter earlier on Saturday. FBI officials were also on scene.


A mother who was at the mall with her daughter said she heard popping noises and saw sparks flying.


"We were outside the Converse store and we just heard all this popping," Elaine Penicaro explained to FOX 4. "We kind of all just stopped, and then a second later, just 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop,' and there were sparks flying like it was right in front of us."





















US, Ukraine to blame for terror attack against Prilepin — Russian MFA

US, Ukraine to blame for terror attack against Prilepin — Russian MFA

US, Ukraine to blame for terror attack against Prilepin — Russian MFA




©Alexander Shcherbak/TASS






Kiev and its Western patrons, in the first place, the US are primarily responsible for the terrorist attack against writer Zakhar Prilepin, the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement on Saturday.







"Responsibility for this and other terrorist acts lies not only with the Ukrainian authorities, but with their Western patrons, in the first place, the United States, who since the coup d'etat of February 2014 have painstakingly nurtured the anti-Russian neo-Nazi project in Ukraine," the statement reads.


"The lack of Washington’s condemnation of another in a string of terrorist attacks against a Russian journalist and public figure is an act of self-exposure by the US authorities. The silence of international organizations concerned is impermissible."




Car of Russian Author Zakhar Prilepin Blown Up in Nizhny Novgorod Region




"The terrorist attack against Prilepin is yet another manifestation of the systemic approach to liquidating ideological opponents, which has been actively cultivated in Ukraine by Washington since 2014 to have becoming a basic reflex of the Kiev regime," the Foreign Ministry said.


The Foreign Ministry offered condolences to the near and dear ones of the man who died in the attack and wished Prilepin a prompt recovery.



Details of terrorist attack



On Saturday morning, an explosive device went off in an Audi Q7 carrying Zakhar Prilepin. The incident occurred in the village of Pionersky, the Nizhny Novgorod Region.


The writer was wounded and his driver killed. There were no other victims, the police said.


A criminal case was launched under article 205 of the Criminal Code (an act of terrorism). Law enforcement officials told TASS that a group of saboteurs might have been behind the attack.


The investigators are probing into the complicity of a detainee, identified as Alexander Permyakov, in the assassination attempt. The suspect has testified he has been acting on instructions from Ukrainian secret services.










Russia’s response to drone attack on Kremlin to be proportional — diplomat



Russia is working on a proportionate response to Ukraine’s drone attack on the Kremlin, Konstantin Gavrilov, head of the Russian delegation to the Vienna talks on military security and arms control, said on Friday.


"Our response will follow. The country’s leadership is thinking it over. I completely agree with speaker of the State Duma (lower parliament house) Vyacheslav Volodin who says that the response should be well-weight so that those who did it - both Kiev and its sponsors - had no intention to repeat such actions," he said in an interview with the Rossiya-24 television channel.


"The response should be proportionate but felt by all," he added.


He slammed calls for the use of nuclear weapons as inappropriate. "We have a military doctrine about when nuclear weapons can be used, and empty calls for the use of nuclear weapons are premature and inappropriate," he stressed.


On May 3, Kiev tried to use two drones to carry out a night-time strike on the Kremlin residence of the Russian president. The Russian military and special services promptly disabled the drones that were targeting the Kremlin. The press service of the head of state said that Vladimir Putin was not harmed, his schedule was not changed, and his work continued as usual.


The Kremlin slammed the attack as a pre-planned act of terrorism and an attempt on the life of the head of state. Moscow reserved the right to retaliate in a suitable way and at an appropriate moment.





















Saturday, 6 May 2023

LIVE UPDATES - At Least 185 Ukrainian Servicemen, Mercenaries Killed in Donetsk Area

LIVE UPDATES - At Least 185 Ukrainian Servicemen, Mercenaries Killed in Donetsk Area

LIVE UPDATES - At Least 185 Ukrainian Servicemen, Mercenaries Killed in Donetsk Area




©Valentin Sprinchak/TASS






Over the past day, Russian troops have destroyed at least 185 servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as well as foreign mercenaries, in the Donetsk area, the Russian Defense Ministry’s spokesman Lieutenant-General Igor Konashenkov told reporters on Saturday.







"During the day, more than 185 Ukrainian servicemen and mercenaries, 1 tank, 4 armored combat vehicles, 4 vehicles, 2 D-20 howitzers and 1 D-30 howitzer were destroyed in this area," Konashenkov said.


"Over the past day operational-tactical and army aviation, artillery of groups of troops of the Russian armed forces hit 85 artillery units of the Ukrainian armed forces in firing positions, manpower and military equipment in 104 districts," the general added.


According to him, a US-made AN/TPQ-48 counter-battery radar was also destroyed in the Verkhnekamenka region in the People’s Republic of Lugansk.



Russian air defense shot down 32 Ukrainian drones in a day



"The air defense systems intercepted three HIMARS multiple rocket launchers and one HARM anti-radar missile. During the day, 32 Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles were destroyed in the areas of the settlements of Novoandreevka, Svatovo, Pshenichnoye of the People's Republic of Lugansk, Gorlovka, Volnovakha of the People's Republic of Donetsk, Vasylivka, Chubarevka and Orekhov in the Zaporozhye region," Konashenkov claimed.



Two Ukrainian Ballistic Missiles Shot Down Over Crimea - Crimean Authorities



Russia's air defense systems on Saturday shot down two ballistic missiles launched by Ukraine's Grom-2 operational-tactical missile system (OTRK) over Crimea, Oleg Kryuchkov, an adviser to Head of Crimea Sergey Aksyonov, said on Saturday.


"Updated information. Two Grom-2 OTRK ballistic missiles were shot down over Crimea," Kryuchkov said on Telegram.


Earlier in the day, Aksyonov said that one missile of that kind had been shot down over Crimea by the Russian air defense systems.


"A ballistic missile launched by Ukraine's Hrim-2 OTRK was shot down over the Republic of Crimea by the air defense," Aksyonov said on Telegram.


The incident did not cause any damage or victims, he added.



Ukrainian forces lose up to 90 servicemen in South Donetsk, Zaporozhye areas



In the South Donetsk and Zaporozhye areas, air strikes and artillery fire from the Vostok group of troops defeated units of the Ukrainian armed forces in the areas of the settlements of Gulyaipole, Zaporozhye region, and Ugledar, Donetsk People's Republic, the Russian Defense Ministry’s spokesman reported.







"During the day, up to 90 Ukrainian servicemen, 2 armored combat vehicles, 4 cars, as well as a D-30 howitzer were destroyed in these areas. An ammunition depot of the 35th marine battalion of the Ukrainian armed forces was destroyed near the village of Velyka Novoselka," he said.


He added that over the past day, the Russian military destroyed up to 35 Ukrainian soldiers in the Kherson direction, as well as enemy equipment.


"In the Kherson direction, up to 35 Ukrainian servicemen, 2 vehicles and a Gvozdika self-propelled howitzer were destroyed as a result of fire damage per day," he specified.



Up to 60 Ukrainian soldiers wiped out in Krasnolimansk area



According to Konashenkov, in the Krasnolimansky direction, operational-tactical and army aviation, artillery fire of the Center group of forces defeated the units of the Ukrainian army in the areas of the settlements of Nevskoye and Chervonaya Dibrova of the People's Republic of Lugansk.


"Up to 60 Ukrainian servicemen, an armored combat vehicle, 3 pickup trucks, a Gvozdika self-propelled artillery mount and 2 D-30 howitzers were destroyed," the general noted.


Meanwhile, the losses of the Ukrainian forces in the Kupyansk area amounted to 50 people, 2 armored vehicles and an Akatsiya self-propelled howitzer, he added.


"In the Kupyansk direction, air strikes and artillery fire from the Western Group of Forces hit enemy units in the areas of the settlements of Kislovka and Berestovoye in the Kharkov region. Up to 50 Ukrainian servicemen, two armored combat vehicles, three cars, and an Akatsiya self-propelled howitzer were destroyed in this direction in a day," the Russian Defense Ministry’s spokesman pointed out.



Russian forces destroy 9,000 Ukrainian tanks since military operation's start



"In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the following weapons have been destroyed: 418 aircraft, 230 helicopters, 3,995 unmanned aerial vehicles, 421 anti-aircraft missile systems, 9,002 tanks and other armored combat vehicles, 1,096 combat vehicles of multiple launch rocket systems, 4,748 field artillery guns and mortars, as well as 10,002 units of special military vehicles," Konashenkov concluded.



Russia says its forces eliminated Ukrainian recon group is southern Donetsk Region



Russian forces took out a Ukrainian reconnaissance group made up of four servicemen in the south of the Donetsk Region, Alexander Gordeyev, a spokesman for the battlegroup East, has told TASS.








"Forward units of the battlegroup East detected an enemy reconnaissance group moving southward of the Novomikhailovka settlement. The group was eliminated with artillery support, and four militants have been destroyed," he said.


Gordeyev also said that a self-propelled Tulpan mortar destroyed a Ukrainian military location in Velikaya Novosyolka. Seven militants were taken out. In Ugledar, artillery fire destroyed an enemy armored vehicle with five militants, and anti-armor rocket destroyed an enemy tank, the spokesman said.



Akhmat commandos wait for orders to push towards Artyomovsk – Kadyrov



Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov has said that the Akhmat commando force is ready to move into Artemovsk (Ukrainian name Bakhmut).


"Akhmat [commando] units are ready to move to Artemovsk (Bakhmut). I have already signed the corresponding message to the Supreme Commander-in-Chief saying the Akhmat units are ready to take control of the city and to clear it from NATO and Ukrainian satanists. The fighters are in combat readiness. We are only waiting for the orders. Several units are already on the way to the zone of the special military operation," Kadyrov wrote on his Telegram channel on Saturday.


Head of Chechnya Ramzan Kadyrov
©Yelena Afonina/TASS


The Chechen leader is certain that Artyomovsk will soon be liberated.


"In the near future we will liberate the city, despite all sorts of fake news about some terrible counterattack by the Ukrainian army. We have already begun to develop our own strategy for this area together with the Russian Defense Ministry and with due regard for the tactics being used by the enemy and the resources available to us. Believe me, the tactic will yield positive results," Kadyrov added.















Fox asks Dominion Voting to probe leaks of Tucker Carlson messages

Fox asks Dominion Voting to probe leaks of Tucker Carlson messages

Fox asks Dominion Voting to probe leaks of Tucker Carlson messages




Former Fox personality Tucker Carlson speaks at the 2017 Business Insider Ignition: Future of Media conference in New York, U.S., November 30, 2017. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson/File Photo






Fox News on Friday asked lawyers for Dominion Voting Systems to investigate whether they leaked controversial internal messages from ousted Fox host Tucker Carlson that were provided in evidence for their recent defamation lawsuit.







The requests, which were made in letters released by Fox, came after multiple news outlets published racist and sexist remarks by Carlson contained in leaked internal messages and recordings.


Fox News and its parent company Fox Corp (FOXA.O) said those were given to Dominion as part of the lawsuit, which claimed Fox defamed Dominion by airing false election-rigging claims. The material was to remain confidential per court orders and the terms of the network's $787.5 million settlement with the Denver-based voting technology company last month.


Fox requested that Dominion's lawyers at Farnan LLP "immediately make an investigation into the circumstances surrounding this inexcusable release of confidential discovery material" and report the findings by the end of Monday.


Dominion denied the materials came from the company or any of its lawyers. "Nobody associated with Dominion shared these confidential materials with the press," the company said.


In a separate letter to Dominion lawyers at Susman Godfrey LLP and Clare Locke LLP, Fox said the disclosures "violate the text and spirit" of the settlement agreement, which "requires return or destruction" of all confidential discovery materials.


Fox is seeking to contain the public relations fallout from the leaks. The network on Friday sent a letter to the left-leaning watchdog group Media Matters demanding that it cease publishing leaked footage of Carlson on set.


Media Matters President Angelo Carusone said in a statement that "reporting on newsworthy leaked material is a cornerstone of journalism" and that it was "absurd" for Fox to argue otherwise.


Dominion alleged in its lawsuit that Fox knowingly spread false claims that its ballot-counting machines were used to rig the 2020 U.S. election against former Republican President Donald Trump and in favor of Joe Biden, a Democrat.


Fox denied the claims but settled the case in Delaware Superior Court. The deal came just before opening statements were set to begin in what promised to be the most closely watched media trial in decades, featuring testimony from Fox Corp chairman Rupert Murdoch.


Carlson, a staple of primetime cable news and Fox's biggest star, was abruptly fired just days later. Media outlets including the New York Times reported that the decision came after Fox's board saw Carlson's internal messages.







The Times reported on Tuesday that Fox was particularly concerned by a Carlson message - which was redacted in public versions of court filings - in which he criticized Trump supporters for beating up an outnumbered leftist demonstrator because that was "not how white men fight."


The Daily Beast reported on Friday on a text message in which Carlson used a misogynistic slur, the second publicly reported instance of him doing so.



Why Tucker Carlson’s text message about “white men” matters



On Tuesday night, the New York Times revealed a text message that reportedly played some role in Tucker Carlson’s firing from Fox News. And, on the surface, it simply doesn’t seem much worse than the things he said on air.


In the text, Carlson describes watching a video of several Trump supporters beating up an (alleged) antifa member on the streets of Washington, DC. His reaction is nuanced: He confesses to feeling a certain vicious bloodlust while watching the video — “I really wanted them to hurt the kid” — but realizes that this is a horrific impulse that ought to concern him. “I should remember that somewhere somebody probably loves this kid, and would be crushed if he was killed,” Carlson writes.


But the most important line is one where he describes the attack in racial terms: “Jumping a guy like that is dishonorable obviously. It’s not how white men fight.”


His obvious implication is that nonwhite men gang up on defenseless opponents all the time, whereas whites only commit violence honorably.


It’s certainly a terrible sentiment (and a false one), but is it any worse than mainstreaming the “great replacement” conspiracy theory developed by white supremacists? Is it more offensive than saying immigrants make America “poorer, and dirtier, and more divided”? Is it more racist than downplaying the killings of unarmed Black men by the police, or accusing Tennessee state Rep. Justin Pearson (who is Black) of putting on a fake “sharecropper” accent?


Tucker has done all of these things on the air, out in the open. As a result, the general reaction from the commentariat to the New York Times’s reporting on the text is: Really?


“Gotta say all the Tucker leaks seem like post-hoc face saving nonsense that make the... suits at Fox look worse than him,” the Bulwark’s Tim Miller wrote in a representative tweet. “There’s nothing in them that meaningfully worse than what was on air which they ignored for years.”


I sympathize with this line of thinking. In an objective sense, what Carlson wrote in his text really isn’t any worse than what he said on the air. It seems almost deliberately obtuse on the part of Fox’s leadership to see a difference in kind.








But if you spent a lot of time watching Carlson’s show, as I have, you’d see that this is actually a distinction that matters for his ideological project.


A core part of Tucker Carlson’s message is that he, and his viewers, are colorblind: that they are standing up for the ideals of Martin Luther King Jr. against liberals who want to polarize America along racial lines for their own nefarious purposes. “You can’t attack people, whole groups of people on the basis of their race and ethnicity. Not in the media, especially,” he said in a representative February broadcast.


Liberals are so used to dismissing such professions of racial innocence as absurd — and they are — that they may be missing the crucial role it plays in Carlson’s narrative. The norm against explicit racism is so powerful in polite American society that someone like Carlson, who is obviously mainstreaming racist ideas, needs to give permission to his viewers to believe racist things while thinking of themselves as not racist.


That’s the line Carlson toed, very carefully, on air. And it’s one the text about how “white men fight” erases.


Whether or not it’s true the text was an important factor in Carlson’s firing, it’s worth understanding why it’s plausible that Fox’s board would see a meaningful distinction between his public nightly act and this private text.


Because this isn’t just a story about one man and his television show, but about the way that modern American racism operates — how it has managed to survive and even thrive on television’s highest-rated cable news show.



Tucker Carlson’s text message was not surprising — but it was revelatory



To get a better sense of the context in which Carlson’s text would be viewed, I read through a 59-page timeline compiled by Media Matters that documents “Tucker Carlson’s descent into white supremacy” — an exhaustive list of his most inflammatory comments on race and immigration dating from 2004 all the way until a month before his firing.


In the document, there are 205 uses of the word “white”; many are not from Carlson, and some predate his current Fox show. When he says “white” or “white people,” he typically is using it to position whites not as superior but as victims — a persecuted group under attack by the real racists: liberals.


Seeing whites as at once the master race and victims is common in racist thought. Nazi propaganda described Jews as both inferior to Aryans and their conspiratorial oppressors; modern-day white supremacists routinely warn about the prospect of “white genocide,” a specter that Carlson also invoked on his show.


But Carlson’s maneuver was to sever the theory of white victimhood from its explicit white supremacist roots. Fox viewers should stand up for white interests not because whites are the superior race, in this narrative, but because they’re being victimized by the dastardly Democrats and race-mongers who are standing in the way of racial harmony.







The premise of the Tucker worldview is that the United States has, for many years now, had a consensus on an ideal of colorblindness. It is liberals, he argued, who keep seeing race in everything and try to foment racial division. As he put it in a 2018 monologue:


There’s a basic moral principle that was, for a long time, conventional wisdom in this country. It was this: people deserve to be treated as individuals, judged by their own efforts and abilities on the things they can control. Attacking people on the basis of their race is wrong. That was the standard, and for a long time almost everybody in America believed it — or claimed to believe it. Not anymore: on the left, it’s now acceptable — even encouraged — to attack and discriminate against people solely on the basis of their skin color. Now you’re not supposed to say anything about it, but suddenly it’s everywhere.


This was not a one-off. Over and over and over again — even in a segment just weeks before his firing — Tucker Carlson reassured his viewers that they were the ones standing up for colorblindness and against racism, and that Democrats were the ones propagating it.


Consider one December segment, where Carlson attacks some California cash transfer programs that prioritize people of color (among other groups) for payments. He terms it part of a “race-based spoils system” comparable to Jim Crow that would require the use of “Nazi race science” to identify who qualified for race-based payouts.


This is, of course, ludicrous: What Carlson is saying should scan as obvious demagoguery designed to inflame white Republican fears about Democrats and minorities stealing their money. After all, Carlson is a guy whom white nationalists repeatedly praised for mainstreaming their message, who employed an out-and-out racist as his top writer for years, and who privately promoted an article written by a commentator who has questioned whether Auschwitz was a death camp. Critical viewers could easily see what Tucker Carlson was really about, and what he was actually trying to do on his show.


This is, of course, ludicrous: What Carlson is saying should scan as obvious demagoguery designed to inflame white Republican fears about Democrats and minorities stealing their money. After all, Carlson is a guy whom white nationalists repeatedly praised for mainstreaming their message, who employed an out-and-out racist as his top writer for years, and who privately promoted an article written by a commentator who has questioned whether Auschwitz was a death camp. Critical viewers could easily see what Tucker Carlson was really about, and what he was actually trying to do on his show.


But liberals who see white supremacy in Tucker’s show as self-evident risk missing what made him much more effective than avowed racists. Here was someone who somehow managed to both promote the “great replacement theory” and insist, at the same time, that his opponents are today’s equivalents of segregationists and Nazis. That he rode this trick to cable’s highest-rated nightly audience for years says something important about how even barely disguised racism can spread more effectively among the broader public than the uncut stuff.


The way Carlson talked about the “great replacement,” a term literally lifted from the racist right, is instructive.


Carlson did not explicitly say, as white nationalists do, that the problem with mass immigration was that it undermined the foundations of white supremacy. Instead, it’s couched in terms of national origin and partisan politics, pitting “legacy Americans” and patriotic conservatives against Democrats and their malign obsession with tilting the country’s demographics in their favor. It’s a form of “eugenics” — his word — deployed for the horrible purpose of pursuing political power.


“Everyone wants to make a racial issue out of it. Oh, you know, the white replacement theory? No no, this is a voting rights question,” Carlson risibly insisted in a 2021 segment. “I have less political power because they’re importing a brand-new electorate.”


In his transmission of the “great replacement theory” from the dank corners of the internet to nightly cable news, Tucker changed the language just enough so that his audience could believe he was merely defending native-born Americans against the anti-white racism and the anti-American project of the left.


I haven’t seen every second of his godforsaken program; it’s possible he let slip the occasional unadulterated remark. But the text reported by the Times — “It’s not how white men fight” — is certainly as undisguised an expression of his white supremacist thought as I’ve seen.


In that private message, Carlson expresses a straight-up racist sentiment: no more pretend colorblindness, or posturing like he’s merely being xenophobic rather than racist.


Again, to most people on the left, the text was hardly different from what he’s been spouting every night for years. But it’s also plausible that to many Americans, the explicit racism of a private message is something new — and that that’s a revelation the Fox News board worried about.